Optimization of HIFU monotherapy for prostate cancer

K. Pozdnyakov, V. Bazaev, V. Dutov
{"title":"Optimization of HIFU monotherapy for prostate cancer","authors":"K. Pozdnyakov, V. Bazaev, V. Dutov","doi":"10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-1-42-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. One of the most researched alternative treatments for localized prostate cancer (PCa) is ultrasound ablation (HIFU ¾ High-intensity Focused Ultrasound). Although the world history of the application of this method of PCa treatment is more than 15 years old, the scope of the application of the method has not finally been determined.Purpose of the study. To study the results of the application of ultrasound ablation in the treatment of patients with localized and locally advanced PCa.Materials and methods. The study included 147 patients with PCa who underwent HIFU treatment using the AblathermÒ device («EDAP TMS», Vaulx-en-Velin, Lyon, France). Group 1 included patients with localized and locally advanced PCa treated at the stage of gaining experience and evaluating the results of treatment (n = 82). Group 2 consisted of patients with localized PCa of low and moderate oncological risk (n = 65). The number of sessions in group 1 varied from 1 (65) to 2 (17). The need to perform a second session was associated with the ineffectiveness of the first. HIFU was also performed after the failure of external beam radiation (2), and photodynamic (1) therapy. In group 2, 61 patients received one treatment session, 4 patients received 2 sessions each. The mean follow-up time for the patients in group 1 was 17.4 ± 5.2 (3 – 29) months, for group 2 was 18.2 ± 7.3 (3 – 29) months.Results. In group 1 of patients with a low degree of oncological risk, a decrease in blood prostate-specific antigen (PSA) below the threshold value and the absence of its significant increase during the observation period was noted in 87.5% of cases (28 patients), with an average degree of oncological risk in 65.6% of cases (21 patients), with a high degree in 27.7% of cases (5 patients). In 34.1% (28 patients), the treatment was ineffective, 21 of them underwent repeated ultrasound ablation of the prostate, and 7 patients received subsequent external beam radiation therapy. These results led us to abandon the use of HIFU in patients with baseline blood PSA levels greater than 20 ng/ml and locally advanced disease. In group 2, biochemical recurrence was noted in 9 patients. A control biopsy in 6 patients confirmed local recurrence, which became the basis for a second HIFU session (4). Five patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy. The total effectiveness of the treatment in group 2 was 86.2%.Conclusion. The results support the notion that HIFU is a treatment option for localized PCa only. The evaluation of the initial results led us to abandon treatment with this method in patients with locally advanced and high-risk localized PCa.","PeriodicalId":345779,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Urologii","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Urologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-1-42-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. One of the most researched alternative treatments for localized prostate cancer (PCa) is ultrasound ablation (HIFU ¾ High-intensity Focused Ultrasound). Although the world history of the application of this method of PCa treatment is more than 15 years old, the scope of the application of the method has not finally been determined.Purpose of the study. To study the results of the application of ultrasound ablation in the treatment of patients with localized and locally advanced PCa.Materials and methods. The study included 147 patients with PCa who underwent HIFU treatment using the AblathermÒ device («EDAP TMS», Vaulx-en-Velin, Lyon, France). Group 1 included patients with localized and locally advanced PCa treated at the stage of gaining experience and evaluating the results of treatment (n = 82). Group 2 consisted of patients with localized PCa of low and moderate oncological risk (n = 65). The number of sessions in group 1 varied from 1 (65) to 2 (17). The need to perform a second session was associated with the ineffectiveness of the first. HIFU was also performed after the failure of external beam radiation (2), and photodynamic (1) therapy. In group 2, 61 patients received one treatment session, 4 patients received 2 sessions each. The mean follow-up time for the patients in group 1 was 17.4 ± 5.2 (3 – 29) months, for group 2 was 18.2 ± 7.3 (3 – 29) months.Results. In group 1 of patients with a low degree of oncological risk, a decrease in blood prostate-specific antigen (PSA) below the threshold value and the absence of its significant increase during the observation period was noted in 87.5% of cases (28 patients), with an average degree of oncological risk in 65.6% of cases (21 patients), with a high degree in 27.7% of cases (5 patients). In 34.1% (28 patients), the treatment was ineffective, 21 of them underwent repeated ultrasound ablation of the prostate, and 7 patients received subsequent external beam radiation therapy. These results led us to abandon the use of HIFU in patients with baseline blood PSA levels greater than 20 ng/ml and locally advanced disease. In group 2, biochemical recurrence was noted in 9 patients. A control biopsy in 6 patients confirmed local recurrence, which became the basis for a second HIFU session (4). Five patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy. The total effectiveness of the treatment in group 2 was 86.2%.Conclusion. The results support the notion that HIFU is a treatment option for localized PCa only. The evaluation of the initial results led us to abandon treatment with this method in patients with locally advanced and high-risk localized PCa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌HIFU单药治疗的优化
介绍。针对局限性前列腺癌(PCa),研究最多的替代治疗方法之一是超声消融(HIFU¾高强度聚焦超声)。虽然世界上应用这种方法治疗前列腺癌的历史超过15年,但该方法的应用范围尚未最终确定。研究目的:目的:探讨超声消融治疗局限性和局部晚期前列腺癌的效果。材料和方法。该研究包括147例使用AblathermÒ设备(«EDAP TMS»,Vaulx-en-Velin, Lyon, France)接受HIFU治疗的PCa患者。组1包括在获得经验和评估治疗结果阶段接受治疗的局限性和局部晚期PCa患者(n = 82)。第二组为低、中度肿瘤风险的局限性PCa患者(n = 65)。第一组的治疗次数从1(65)到2(17)不等。执行第二次会话的需要与第一次会话的无效有关。在外束放疗(2)和光动力治疗(1)失败后也进行了HIFU。2组61例患者接受1次治疗,4例患者各接受2次治疗。1组患者平均随访时间为17.4±5.2(3 ~ 29)个月,2组患者平均随访时间为18.2±7.3(3 ~ 29)个月。低风险程度组1中,87.5%的患者(28例)血前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)降至阈值以下,观察期内PSA未明显升高,平均风险程度为65.6%(21例),高风险程度为27.7%(5例)。34.1%(28例)治疗无效,其中21例反复行前列腺超声消融,7例后续行外束放射治疗。这些结果使我们放弃对基线血液PSA水平大于20 ng/ml和局部晚期疾病的患者使用HIFU。2组9例患者出现生化复发。6例患者的对照活检证实局部复发,这成为第二次HIFU治疗的基础(4)。5例患者接受了辅助激素治疗。2组总有效率为86.2%。结果支持HIFU仅是局部PCa的治疗选择的观点。对初步结果的评估使我们放弃了在局部晚期和高危的局限性PCa患者中使用这种方法的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic retropubic extraurethral adenomectomy The non-biological simulator with the ability to regulate the position of the kidney and bone landmarks: use for training puncture access in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy New coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Is there an impact on male reproductive health Opportunities for early detection of prostate cancer in young and middle-aged men Recent advances in transurethral resection of bladder tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1