Philosophy as Transformation in Early Christian Thought

M. Champion
{"title":"Philosophy as Transformation in Early Christian Thought","authors":"M. Champion","doi":"10.1163/9789004429567_007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Extract] This chapter* explores intersections between the philosophical goal of godlikeness, virtue development, and ways of knowing in late-antique monasticism. It traces philosophical ideas from Stoicism and Platonism which remained influential in Late Antiquity, before analysing works of Dorotheus of Gaza, an influential sixth-century monk, who had trained in rhetoric and medicine in Gaza and Alexandria, before he entered a monastery at Thawatha, just outside Gaza. The movement I explore is from godlikeness to virtue and back again. This transition involves translating between ethical and metaphysical claims, and entails a distinctive way of going about knowing. In Dorotheus of Gaza, practising the virtues likens monks to God, and what counts as a virtue is determined by claims about what God is like. Humility—in the Classical world a highly unlikely candidate for virtue, let alone the paradigmatic virtue Dorotheus makes of it—is a means by which a good monk becomes godlike, because God-incarnate is humble. Metaphysical claims entail virtues and practising a particular virtue opens up knowledge about metaphysical truths.¹ \n \nIn the case of Palestinian monasticism, as for the Neoplatonists discussed elsewhere in this volume, one comes to know that God and the world are like this rather than that, through reading and reflecting in ways that are taken to be transformative rather than merely informative. In this frame, knowing that humility is a virtue because humility characterises God is necessary but insufficient. Such knowledge is acquired through reading, praying, and meditating (activities often spoken about interchangeably). In a broader argument which requires a longer elaboration than is possible within the constraints of this paper, I hope to show that Dorotheus structures his monastic discourses as a whole in order to move readers ever deeper into knowledge of virtues like humility and the resulting concept of what God is really like, and that this view of texts as transformational is itself dependent on the metaphysical claim that it is possible for humans to become godlike through the exercise of the virtues and other practices, reading, praying and meditating among them. Here I can make the more limited claim that Dorotheus’ account of humility is grounded in metaphysics, and that his theoretical claims in the areas of virtue and metaphysics are meant to transform readers to become godlike. Dorotheus’ reflections on monastic life provide metaphors to live by, by which insiders, in this case monks in Palestine, come to embody truths significant for their community in a process of self-transformation through the acquisition of theoretical knowledge and its concomitant claims on the ethical life.","PeriodicalId":414737,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Christianity and Late Antique Philosophy","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Christianity and Late Antique Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004429567_007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[Extract] This chapter* explores intersections between the philosophical goal of godlikeness, virtue development, and ways of knowing in late-antique monasticism. It traces philosophical ideas from Stoicism and Platonism which remained influential in Late Antiquity, before analysing works of Dorotheus of Gaza, an influential sixth-century monk, who had trained in rhetoric and medicine in Gaza and Alexandria, before he entered a monastery at Thawatha, just outside Gaza. The movement I explore is from godlikeness to virtue and back again. This transition involves translating between ethical and metaphysical claims, and entails a distinctive way of going about knowing. In Dorotheus of Gaza, practising the virtues likens monks to God, and what counts as a virtue is determined by claims about what God is like. Humility—in the Classical world a highly unlikely candidate for virtue, let alone the paradigmatic virtue Dorotheus makes of it—is a means by which a good monk becomes godlike, because God-incarnate is humble. Metaphysical claims entail virtues and practising a particular virtue opens up knowledge about metaphysical truths.¹ In the case of Palestinian monasticism, as for the Neoplatonists discussed elsewhere in this volume, one comes to know that God and the world are like this rather than that, through reading and reflecting in ways that are taken to be transformative rather than merely informative. In this frame, knowing that humility is a virtue because humility characterises God is necessary but insufficient. Such knowledge is acquired through reading, praying, and meditating (activities often spoken about interchangeably). In a broader argument which requires a longer elaboration than is possible within the constraints of this paper, I hope to show that Dorotheus structures his monastic discourses as a whole in order to move readers ever deeper into knowledge of virtues like humility and the resulting concept of what God is really like, and that this view of texts as transformational is itself dependent on the metaphysical claim that it is possible for humans to become godlike through the exercise of the virtues and other practices, reading, praying and meditating among them. Here I can make the more limited claim that Dorotheus’ account of humility is grounded in metaphysics, and that his theoretical claims in the areas of virtue and metaphysics are meant to transform readers to become godlike. Dorotheus’ reflections on monastic life provide metaphors to live by, by which insiders, in this case monks in Palestine, come to embody truths significant for their community in a process of self-transformation through the acquisition of theoretical knowledge and its concomitant claims on the ethical life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哲学作为早期基督教思想的转变
【节选】本章*探讨了古代晚期修道主义中神性哲学目标、美德发展和认知方式之间的交集。书中追溯了在古代晚期仍有影响力的斯多葛主义和柏拉图主义的哲学思想,然后分析了加沙的多罗修斯的作品。多罗修斯是一位有影响力的六世纪僧侣,在加沙和亚历山大接受过修辞学和医学训练,之后进入了加沙外的塔瓦塔修道院。我探索的运动是从神性到美德再回来。这种转变涉及伦理和形而上学主张之间的转换,需要一种独特的认识方式。在《迦萨的多罗修斯》中,修士们的美德被比作上帝,而什么是美德是由对上帝的描述来决定的。谦逊——在古典世界里是一种非常不可能的美德,更不用说多罗修斯所认为的典范美德了——是一种使一个好和尚变得像神一样的手段,因为神的化身是谦卑的。形而上学的主张包含了美德,实践一种特定的美德开启了关于形而上学真理的知识。¹在巴勒斯坦修道主义的情况下,就像本卷其他地方讨论的新柏拉图主义者一样,人们通过阅读和思考的方式来了解上帝和世界是这样的,而不是那样的,这些方式被认为是变革的,而不仅仅是提供信息。在这个框架下,知道谦卑是一种美德,因为谦卑是上帝的特征是必要的,但还不够。这些知识是通过阅读、祈祷和冥想获得的(这些活动经常被交替提及)。在一个更广泛的争论中这需要更长的阐述在这篇论文的限制下是不可能的,我希望展示多罗修斯将他的修道院话语作为一个整体来构建,以便让读者更深入地了解美德,比如谦卑,以及由此产生的上帝真正是什么样子的概念,这种认为文本具有变革性的观点本身依赖于形而上学的主张,即人类有可能通过美德的练习和其他实践,阅读,祈祷和冥想,变得像上帝一样。在这里,我可以提出一个更有限的观点,即多罗修斯对谦卑的描述是建立在形而上学的基础上的,他在美德和形而上学领域的理论主张是为了把读者变成神一样。多罗修斯对修道院生活的反思提供了生活的隐喻,内部人士,在这个例子中是巴勒斯坦的僧侣,通过对理论知识的获取以及随之而来的对伦理生活的要求在自我转变的过程中体现了对他们的社区很重要的真理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Philosophy and Theology in Late Antiquity: Some Reflections on Concepts and Terminologies Civic Virtues and the Goal of Likeness to God in Proclus’ Republic Commentary Summarising Platonic Education in Proclus’ Reading of Plato’s Cave and Divided Line The Greek Jargon of Logic and East Syrian Intra-elite Conflicts in the Early Islamic Empire Pagan and Christian Dream Theory in Maximus the Confessor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1