The Long Grass at the North Pole

Andrew Serdy
{"title":"The Long Grass at the North Pole","authors":"Andrew Serdy","doi":"10.1163/22116427_012010014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though legally no more significant than any other point in the Arctic Ocean, into which State’s continental shelf the geographic North Pole will ultimately fall is politically charged for the three States involved – Canada, Denmark (Greenland) and Russia – that have submitted to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf outer limits within which the Pole falls. The 2014 Danish submission, for an area extending beyond the equidistance line with Canada, was in that sense paradoxically helpful to Canada, as Denmark, with the northernmost land territory, is by definition closest to the Pole, which must therefore lie on its side of any such line drawn between itself and any other State; thus Denmark gave cover to Canada which needed to take a similar approach to define its continental shelf entitlement as including the North Pole. Boundaries will eventually have to be delimited, but as it likely to be 20 years before the Commission examines the last of the submissions, the three States have ample pretext to postpone this step until then, a solution likely to suit them all.","PeriodicalId":202575,"journal":{"name":"The Yearbook of Polar Law Online","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Yearbook of Polar Law Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22116427_012010014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though legally no more significant than any other point in the Arctic Ocean, into which State’s continental shelf the geographic North Pole will ultimately fall is politically charged for the three States involved – Canada, Denmark (Greenland) and Russia – that have submitted to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf outer limits within which the Pole falls. The 2014 Danish submission, for an area extending beyond the equidistance line with Canada, was in that sense paradoxically helpful to Canada, as Denmark, with the northernmost land territory, is by definition closest to the Pole, which must therefore lie on its side of any such line drawn between itself and any other State; thus Denmark gave cover to Canada which needed to take a similar approach to define its continental shelf entitlement as including the North Pole. Boundaries will eventually have to be delimited, but as it likely to be 20 years before the Commission examines the last of the submissions, the three States have ample pretext to postpone this step until then, a solution likely to suit them all.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北极的长草
地理上的北极最终将落在一个国家的大陆架上,虽然在法律上并不比北冰洋上的任何其他点更重要,但在政治上,有关的三个国家- -加拿大、丹麦(格陵兰)和俄罗斯- -已向大陆架界限委员会提交了北极落在其中的外部界限。2014年丹麦提交的关于与加拿大等距线以外地区的划界,在这个意义上对加拿大有矛盾的帮助,因为拥有最北端陆地领土的丹麦,根据定义最靠近北极,因此北极必须位于其与任何其他国家之间划设的等距线的一侧;因此,丹麦为加拿大提供了掩护,加拿大需要采取类似的方法,将其大陆架权利定义为包括北极在内。边界最终必须划定,但由于委员会可能要等20年才能审查最后一份提交的材料,这三个国家有充分的借口将这一步骤推迟到那时,而这一解决办法可能适合它们所有国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Snjólaug Árnadóttir. Climate Change and Maritime Boundaries: Legal Consequences of Sea Level Rise, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 304. ISBN: 978-1-316-51789-5 Polar Policy in Practice: Tour Guiding in Antarctica Recalcitrant Materialities of a Liminal Ocean: Deconstructing the ‘Arctic Nomos’ Legal Personality in Antarctica The 2018 Judgment by the European Court of Justice on Antarctic MPAS and Its Possible Significance to the Antarctic Treaty System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1