Will-o'-the Wisp? The Search for Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts

J. Murphy
{"title":"Will-o'-the Wisp? The Search for Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts","authors":"J. Murphy","doi":"10.1163/9789004242104_002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n his remarks as a member of the Types of NlACs and Applicable Law Panel at the Naval War College's International Law Conference on Non-International Armed Conflict in the 21st Century, held from June 21 to 23, 2011, David Graham described the lawofnon-internationaI armed conflict as being located at the \"vanishing point of the law of war.\" This is not surprising, because. as Graham further noted, States resist the application of international law to their struggles with rebels. In particular, they resist according status to rebels by applying the law of armed conflict (LOAC) to them. Rather, they prefer to deal with rebels under their own national criminal laws. free from any constraints that might be imposed by the law of armed conlliet. For example. Charles Garraway, speaking on the same panel as Graham, pointed out that the United Kingdom never acknowledged \"the Troubles\" in Northern Ireland as an \"armed conflict\" to which the law of armed conflict might apply. From a historical perspective, express treaty law governing non-international armed conflict was formerly virtually non-existent. After the carnage of World War II, and the extreme brutality of the Nazi Germany fo rces, however, there was a","PeriodicalId":128071,"journal":{"name":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 42 (2012)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 42 (2012)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004242104_002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

I n his remarks as a member of the Types of NlACs and Applicable Law Panel at the Naval War College's International Law Conference on Non-International Armed Conflict in the 21st Century, held from June 21 to 23, 2011, David Graham described the lawofnon-internationaI armed conflict as being located at the "vanishing point of the law of war." This is not surprising, because. as Graham further noted, States resist the application of international law to their struggles with rebels. In particular, they resist according status to rebels by applying the law of armed conflict (LOAC) to them. Rather, they prefer to deal with rebels under their own national criminal laws. free from any constraints that might be imposed by the law of armed conlliet. For example. Charles Garraway, speaking on the same panel as Graham, pointed out that the United Kingdom never acknowledged "the Troubles" in Northern Ireland as an "armed conflict" to which the law of armed conflict might apply. From a historical perspective, express treaty law governing non-international armed conflict was formerly virtually non-existent. After the carnage of World War II, and the extreme brutality of the Nazi Germany fo rces, however, there was a
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
的事物——缕?在非国际性武装冲突中寻求法律
在2011年6月21日至23日举行的海军战争学院“21世纪非国际性武装冲突”国际法会议上,大卫·格雷厄姆(David Graham)作为“非国际性武装冲突类型和适用法律小组”成员发表的讲话中,将非国际性武装冲突法描述为处于“战争法的消失点”。这并不奇怪,因为。正如格雷厄姆进一步指出的那样,各国拒绝将国际法适用于它们与叛乱分子的斗争。特别是,他们通过将武装冲突法(LOAC)适用于叛乱分子来抵制与叛乱分子同等的地位。相反,他们更愿意根据自己国家的刑法来处理叛乱分子。不受武装冲突法可能施加的任何限制。为例。与格雷厄姆在同一小组会议上发言的查尔斯·加罗威指出,联合王国从未承认北爱尔兰的“动乱”是武装冲突法可能适用的“武装冲突”。从历史的角度看,管理非国际性武装冲突的明文条约法以前几乎不存在。然而,在第二次世界大战的大屠杀和纳粹德国军队的极端残暴之后,有了一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Excerpts from the Report of the United Nations Secretary-General’s Panel of Inquiry on the 31 May 2010 Flotilla Incident International Law and International Enforcement Action in Libya Regime Change: Contextual Analysis Judicial Decisions: Judicial Review by the Supreme Court of the Constitutionality of Ordinary Legislation of the Knesset in Light of the Basic Law: Human Dignity and Freedom Methods and Means of Naval Warfare in Non-International Armed Conflicts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1