Comparing Mineral Concentrations of the Middle Chalcolithic Period Ceramics with Soil of Shahrekord District for Verifying their Origin

Hadis Kojouri, G. Kojouri, M. Heydarian, Alireza Khosrowzadeh
{"title":"Comparing Mineral Concentrations of the Middle Chalcolithic Period Ceramics with Soil of Shahrekord District for Verifying their Origin","authors":"Hadis Kojouri, G. Kojouri, M. Heydarian, Alireza Khosrowzadeh","doi":"10.56557/jobari/2023/v29i18228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The present research was designed on soil of Shahrekord district to find and compare its mineral concentration with the Middle Chalcolithic period ceramics which found in the same area to determine their similarities in order to verify the origin of potteries. \nProcedure: Eighty composite soil and eight particles of Middle Chalcolithic Pottery were collected from Shahrekord district and the concentration of phosphorus, copper, molybdenum, lead and cobalt were measured by using atomic absorption spectrophotometry and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), respectively. \nStatistical Analysis: For comparing the mineral concentration of soil and ceramics One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test were used at the significant level of p<0.05. \nResults: The average level of phosphorus, copper, molybdenum, lead and cobalt in the soil of Shahrekord district were 11.31, 12.04, 0.06, 0.79 and 0.126 mg/kg and their average in Middle Chalcolithic Potteries were 2058, 54.11, 0.92, 9.5 and 21.25 ppm, respectively. The statistical analysis showed an obvious and significant difference between soil minerals and ceramics (p<0.01). \nDiscussion: This finding indicates that it is not possible to find out the origin of ancient ceramics by using the concentration of soil elements at present time. These significant differences may attribute to the burial place and the type of pottery used in the ancient kitchen.","PeriodicalId":119621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Applied Research International","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Applied Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56557/jobari/2023/v29i18228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present research was designed on soil of Shahrekord district to find and compare its mineral concentration with the Middle Chalcolithic period ceramics which found in the same area to determine their similarities in order to verify the origin of potteries. Procedure: Eighty composite soil and eight particles of Middle Chalcolithic Pottery were collected from Shahrekord district and the concentration of phosphorus, copper, molybdenum, lead and cobalt were measured by using atomic absorption spectrophotometry and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), respectively. Statistical Analysis: For comparing the mineral concentration of soil and ceramics One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test were used at the significant level of p<0.05. Results: The average level of phosphorus, copper, molybdenum, lead and cobalt in the soil of Shahrekord district were 11.31, 12.04, 0.06, 0.79 and 0.126 mg/kg and their average in Middle Chalcolithic Potteries were 2058, 54.11, 0.92, 9.5 and 21.25 ppm, respectively. The statistical analysis showed an obvious and significant difference between soil minerals and ceramics (p<0.01). Discussion: This finding indicates that it is not possible to find out the origin of ancient ceramics by using the concentration of soil elements at present time. These significant differences may attribute to the burial place and the type of pottery used in the ancient kitchen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shahrekord地区中铜石时代陶瓷与土壤的矿物含量对比,以验证其来源
目的:本研究对Shahrekord地区的土壤进行了研究,并将其与同一地区发现的中铜石器时期陶瓷的矿物含量进行了比较,以确定它们的相似性,以验证陶器的起源。方法:从Shahrekord地区采集80块复合土和8块中铜石器陶器颗粒,分别用原子吸收分光光度法和电感耦合等离子体发射光谱(ICP-OES)测定磷、铜、钼、铅和钴的浓度。统计分析:在p<0.05的显著水平上,采用单因素方差分析(One - Way Analysis of Variance, ANOVA)检验比较土壤和陶瓷的矿物质浓度。结果:沙赫里科德地区土壤中磷、铜、钼、铅和钴的平均含量分别为11.31、12.04、0.06、0.79和0.126 mg/kg,中铜石器时期土壤中磷、铜、钼、铅和钴的平均含量分别为2058、54.11、0.92、9.5和21.25 ppm。统计分析表明,土壤矿物质与陶瓷之间存在显著差异(p<0.01)。讨论:这一发现表明,目前还不可能通过土壤元素的浓度来找出古代陶瓷的起源。这些显著的差异可能归因于埋葬地点和古代厨房中使用的陶器类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building an Automatic Controlled Smart Feral Cat Shelter Using a Microcontroller Arduino Mega Improving Productivity in Automotive Manufacturing: A Combined Approach of Root Cause Analysis and Sem Models Transforming Key Industries in Rivers State: The Impact of Automation and Artificial Intelligence on the Future of Work An Economic Analysis of Marketing Efficiency of Maize in Tamil Nadu, India Research on Complex Optimization Models and Efficient Algorithms for Medications Supply Chain during Major Epidemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1