CAN WE PROMOTE WALKING AS URBAN TRANSPORT?

S. Audrey, H. Fisher
{"title":"CAN WE PROMOTE WALKING AS URBAN TRANSPORT?","authors":"S. Audrey, H. Fisher","doi":"10.2495/ut180301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our research examined the acceptability and effectiveness of a Walk to Work programme in urban workplaces. We conducted a feasibility study and a full-scale randomised controlled trial focusing on the context, implementation and response to an intervention to promote walking during the commute. The 10-week intervention involved training workplace-based Walk to Work promoters to encourage colleagues to increase walking during the journey to and from work. Interviews were conducted with a sample of employers, Walk to Work promoters and employees. During the feasibility study a range of employer perspectives were identified, from active support through uncertainty and cynicism, to resistance. In the main trial, 654 employees from 87 workplaces in south-west England and south Wales provided information about their commute through wearing accelerometers and Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers and completing travel diaries and questionnaires. In comparison to car users, walkers accrued substantially higher levels of daily Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) during the commute (34.3±18.6 vs. 7.4±7.6 minutes, p<0.001) and throughout the day (71.4±21.3 vs. 45.7±20.9 minutes, p<0.001). There was strong evidence that walking to work was associated with a commute distance of less than two kilometres (p<0.001) and the absence of free work car parking (p<0.01). We conclude that walking to work could be an important contributor to urban transport and physical activity levels for working adults. However, attempts to increase walking as urban transport need to take account of individual and workplace circumstances, and wider transport policies. This includes commuting distances, availability of car parking and perceptions of commuting routes. Supporting walking during the daily commute should be a priority for transport, urban planning and public health disciplines.","PeriodicalId":315494,"journal":{"name":"Urban Transport XXIV","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Transport XXIV","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/ut180301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Our research examined the acceptability and effectiveness of a Walk to Work programme in urban workplaces. We conducted a feasibility study and a full-scale randomised controlled trial focusing on the context, implementation and response to an intervention to promote walking during the commute. The 10-week intervention involved training workplace-based Walk to Work promoters to encourage colleagues to increase walking during the journey to and from work. Interviews were conducted with a sample of employers, Walk to Work promoters and employees. During the feasibility study a range of employer perspectives were identified, from active support through uncertainty and cynicism, to resistance. In the main trial, 654 employees from 87 workplaces in south-west England and south Wales provided information about their commute through wearing accelerometers and Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers and completing travel diaries and questionnaires. In comparison to car users, walkers accrued substantially higher levels of daily Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) during the commute (34.3±18.6 vs. 7.4±7.6 minutes, p<0.001) and throughout the day (71.4±21.3 vs. 45.7±20.9 minutes, p<0.001). There was strong evidence that walking to work was associated with a commute distance of less than two kilometres (p<0.001) and the absence of free work car parking (p<0.01). We conclude that walking to work could be an important contributor to urban transport and physical activity levels for working adults. However, attempts to increase walking as urban transport need to take account of individual and workplace circumstances, and wider transport policies. This includes commuting distances, availability of car parking and perceptions of commuting routes. Supporting walking during the daily commute should be a priority for transport, urban planning and public health disciplines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们能不能把步行作为城市交通推广?
我们的研究考察了步行上班计划在城市工作场所的可接受性和有效性。我们进行了可行性研究和一项全面的随机对照试验,重点关注促进通勤期间步行的干预措施的背景、实施和反应。这项为期10周的干预包括培训以工作场所为基础的步行上班促进者,以鼓励同事在上下班途中增加步行。对雇主、步行上班的推动者和雇员进行了抽样采访。在可行性研究期间,确定了一系列雇主的观点,从积极支持到不确定和愤世嫉俗,再到抵制。在主要试验中,来自英格兰西南部和南威尔士87个工作场所的654名员工通过佩戴加速度计和全球定位系统(GPS)接收器,填写旅行日记和问卷,提供了他们的通勤信息。与汽车使用者相比,步行者在通勤期间(34.3±18.6分钟vs. 7.4±7.6分钟,p<0.001)和全天(71.4±21.3分钟vs. 45.7±20.9分钟,p<0.001)积累了更高水平的每日中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)。有强有力的证据表明,步行上班与通勤距离小于两公里(p<0.001)和没有免费工作停车场(p<0.01)有关。我们得出的结论是,步行上班可能是城市交通和在职成年人身体活动水平的重要因素。然而,试图增加步行作为城市交通需要考虑个人和工作场所的情况,以及更广泛的交通政策。这包括通勤距离、停车场的可用性和通勤路线的感知。交通、城市规划和公共卫生学科应优先考虑在日常通勤中支持步行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HIGH-SPEED RAIL SERVICES IN SPAIN AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO POPULATION GROWTH SELECTING KEY QUALITY INDICATORS IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEMS USING A ROBUST METHOD A STUDY ON THE ACTIVATION OF CAR-SHARING THROUGH THE ANALYSIS OF CITIZEN’S PERCEPTION BASED ON EXPERIENCE: FOCUSING ON BUSAN, SOUTH KOREA INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF SOCIAL OVERHEAD CAPITAL STOCK: FOCUSED ON THE TRANSPORTATION SECTOR CORRECTION OF MEASURED TRAFFIC VOLUME ON EXPRESSWAYS BASED ON TRAFFIC VOLUME BALANCING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1