What's the difference?: efficient set reconciliation without prior context

D. Eppstein, M. Goodrich, Frank C. Uyeda, G. Varghese
{"title":"What's the difference?: efficient set reconciliation without prior context","authors":"D. Eppstein, M. Goodrich, Frank C. Uyeda, G. Varghese","doi":"10.1145/2018436.2018462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe a synopsis structure, the Difference Digest, that allows two nodes to compute the elements belonging to the set difference in a single round with communication overhead proportional to the size of the difference times the logarithm of the keyspace. While set reconciliation can be done efficiently using logs, logs require overhead for every update and scale poorly when multiple users are to be reconciled. By contrast, our abstraction assumes no prior context and is useful in networking and distributed systems applications such as trading blocks in a peer-to-peer network, and synchronizing link-state databases after a partition. Our basic set-reconciliation method has a similarity with the peeling algorithm used in Tornado codes [6], which is not surprising, as there is an intimate connection between set difference and coding. Beyond set reconciliation, an essential component in our Difference Digest is a new estimator for the size of the set difference that outperforms min-wise sketches [3] for small set differences. Our experiments show that the Difference Digest is more efficient than prior approaches such as Approximate Reconciliation Trees [5] and Characteristic Polynomial Interpolation [17]. We use Difference Digests to implement a generic KeyDiff service in Linux that runs over TCP and returns the sets of keys that differ between machines.","PeriodicalId":350796,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 conference","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"149","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2018436.2018462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 149

Abstract

We describe a synopsis structure, the Difference Digest, that allows two nodes to compute the elements belonging to the set difference in a single round with communication overhead proportional to the size of the difference times the logarithm of the keyspace. While set reconciliation can be done efficiently using logs, logs require overhead for every update and scale poorly when multiple users are to be reconciled. By contrast, our abstraction assumes no prior context and is useful in networking and distributed systems applications such as trading blocks in a peer-to-peer network, and synchronizing link-state databases after a partition. Our basic set-reconciliation method has a similarity with the peeling algorithm used in Tornado codes [6], which is not surprising, as there is an intimate connection between set difference and coding. Beyond set reconciliation, an essential component in our Difference Digest is a new estimator for the size of the set difference that outperforms min-wise sketches [3] for small set differences. Our experiments show that the Difference Digest is more efficient than prior approaches such as Approximate Reconciliation Trees [5] and Characteristic Polynomial Interpolation [17]. We use Difference Digests to implement a generic KeyDiff service in Linux that runs over TCP and returns the sets of keys that differ between machines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有什么区别?:有效的设置和解没有事先的背景
我们描述了一个概要结构,即差分摘要,它允许两个节点在单轮中计算属于集合差分的元素,其通信开销与差分的大小乘以键空间的对数成正比。虽然使用日志可以有效地完成集合协调,但是每次更新都需要日志开销,并且当要协调多个用户时,日志的可伸缩性很差。相比之下,我们的抽象假设没有先前的上下文,并且在网络和分布式系统应用程序中很有用,例如点对点网络中的交易块,以及在分区后同步链路状态数据库。我们的基本集调和方法与Tornado码中使用的剥离算法有相似之处[6],这并不奇怪,因为集差与编码之间有着密切的联系。除了集调和之外,我们的差异摘要中的一个重要组成部分是一个新的集差异大小估计器,它优于对小集差异的min-wise草图[3]。我们的实验表明,差分摘要比近似调和树[5]和特征多项式插值[17]等先前的方法更有效。我们使用差异摘要在Linux中实现一个通用的KeyDiff服务,该服务在TCP上运行,并返回机器之间不同的密钥集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The evolution of layered protocol stacks leads to an hourglass-shaped architecture Improving datacenter performance and robustness with multipath TCP Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement Insomnia in the access: or how to curb access network related energy consumption Optimizing a virtualized data center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1