Blockchain as a Service (BaaS): Providers and Trust

Jatinder Singh, Johan David Michels
{"title":"Blockchain as a Service (BaaS): Providers and Trust","authors":"Jatinder Singh, Johan David Michels","doi":"10.1109/EuroSPW.2018.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) are receiving much attention. As discussion focuses on the potential applications of DLTs, Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) offerings are emerging to provide the underlying supporting infrastructure. BaaS entails a service provider supplying and managing aspects of a DLT infrastructure to facilitate and bring efficiencies regarding the development, experimentation, deployment, and the ongoing management of DLT applications. However, much of the interest in DLTs stems from their potential to decentralise, disintermediate, and enable ‘trustless’ interactions. At first sight, BaaS – being offered by a provider – appears to run counter to this. In practice, whether BaaS raises substantive trust concerns depends on the nature of the offering, the application's specifics, and the participants' goals and risk appetite. This paper elaborates the nature of BaaS and explores the trust considerations it raises, particularly regarding the role of providers as part of a wider infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":326280,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSPW.2018.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) are receiving much attention. As discussion focuses on the potential applications of DLTs, Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) offerings are emerging to provide the underlying supporting infrastructure. BaaS entails a service provider supplying and managing aspects of a DLT infrastructure to facilitate and bring efficiencies regarding the development, experimentation, deployment, and the ongoing management of DLT applications. However, much of the interest in DLTs stems from their potential to decentralise, disintermediate, and enable ‘trustless’ interactions. At first sight, BaaS – being offered by a provider – appears to run counter to this. In practice, whether BaaS raises substantive trust concerns depends on the nature of the offering, the application's specifics, and the participants' goals and risk appetite. This paper elaborates the nature of BaaS and explores the trust considerations it raises, particularly regarding the role of providers as part of a wider infrastructure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区块链即服务(BaaS):提供者和信任
分布式账本技术(dlt)正受到越来越多的关注。随着讨论集中在dlt的潜在应用上,区块链即服务(BaaS)产品正在出现,以提供底层支持基础设施。BaaS需要服务提供商提供和管理DLT基础设施的各个方面,以促进和提高DLT应用程序的开发、实验、部署和持续管理的效率。然而,人们对dlt的兴趣很大程度上源于它们去中心化、去中介化和实现“无需信任”互动的潜力。乍一看,由提供商提供的BaaS似乎与此背道而驰。在实践中,BaaS是否会引起实质性的信任问题取决于产品的性质、应用程序的细节以及参与者的目标和风险偏好。本文阐述了BaaS的本质,并探讨了它所引起的信任问题,特别是关于提供商作为更广泛的基础设施的一部分的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FP -TESTER : Automated Testing of Browser Fingerprint Resilience The Secret Processor Will Go to the Ball: Benchmark Insider-Proof Encrypted Computing The Impact of Uncle Rewards on Selfish Mining in Ethereum Privacy Compliance Via Model Transformations Inferring OpenVPN State Machines Using Protocol State Fuzzing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1