New technologies and mixed-use convergence: How humans and algorithms are adapting to each other

Sally A. Applin, Michael D. Fischer
{"title":"New technologies and mixed-use convergence: How humans and algorithms are adapting to each other","authors":"Sally A. Applin, Michael D. Fischer","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2015.7439436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human experience with technology has shifted from technological contexts requiring occasional intervention by a fraction of people mostly in command of technologies, to technological contexts that require constant ongoing participation from most people to complete tasks. We examine the current state of `mixed-use' new technologies integration with legacy systems, and whether the human assistance required to complete tasks and processes could function as a training ground for future smart systems, or whether increasing `co-dependence with' or `training of' algorithmic systems, enhancing task completion and inadvertently educating systems in human behaviour and intelligence, will simply subsume people into the algorithmic landscape. As the Internet of Things (IoT) arises in conjunction with advancing robotics and drone technology, semi and fully automated algorithmic systems are being developed that intersect with human experience in new and heterogeneous ways. Many new technologies are not yet flexible enough to support the choices people require in their daily lives, due to limitations in the algorithmic `logics' used that restrict options to predetermined pathways conceived of by programmers. This greatly limits human agency, and presently the potential to overcome problems that arise in processes. In this mixed-use period, we have the opportunity to develop new ways to address ethical guidance as knowledge that machines can learn. We explore promoting embedding of ethically-based principles into automated contexts through: (1) developing mutually agreed automated external ethical review systems (human or otherwise) that evaluate conformance across multiple ethical codes and provide feedback to designers, agents, and users on the distribution of conformance; (2) focusing on review systems to drive distributed development of embedded ethical principles in individual services by responding to this feedback to develop ongoing correction through dynamic adaption or incremental releases; and (3) using multi-agent simulation tools to forecast scenarios in real time.","PeriodicalId":357217,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"586 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2015.7439436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Human experience with technology has shifted from technological contexts requiring occasional intervention by a fraction of people mostly in command of technologies, to technological contexts that require constant ongoing participation from most people to complete tasks. We examine the current state of `mixed-use' new technologies integration with legacy systems, and whether the human assistance required to complete tasks and processes could function as a training ground for future smart systems, or whether increasing `co-dependence with' or `training of' algorithmic systems, enhancing task completion and inadvertently educating systems in human behaviour and intelligence, will simply subsume people into the algorithmic landscape. As the Internet of Things (IoT) arises in conjunction with advancing robotics and drone technology, semi and fully automated algorithmic systems are being developed that intersect with human experience in new and heterogeneous ways. Many new technologies are not yet flexible enough to support the choices people require in their daily lives, due to limitations in the algorithmic `logics' used that restrict options to predetermined pathways conceived of by programmers. This greatly limits human agency, and presently the potential to overcome problems that arise in processes. In this mixed-use period, we have the opportunity to develop new ways to address ethical guidance as knowledge that machines can learn. We explore promoting embedding of ethically-based principles into automated contexts through: (1) developing mutually agreed automated external ethical review systems (human or otherwise) that evaluate conformance across multiple ethical codes and provide feedback to designers, agents, and users on the distribution of conformance; (2) focusing on review systems to drive distributed development of embedded ethical principles in individual services by responding to this feedback to develop ongoing correction through dynamic adaption or incremental releases; and (3) using multi-agent simulation tools to forecast scenarios in real time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新技术和混合用途融合:人类和算法如何相互适应
人类对技术的经验已经从需要少数掌握技术的人偶尔干预的技术环境转变为需要大多数人持续参与完成任务的技术环境。我们研究了“混合使用”新技术与遗留系统集成的现状,以及完成任务和流程所需的人类协助是否可以作为未来智能系统的培训基地,或者是否增加“与算法系统的共同依赖”或“训练”,提高任务完成度并无意中教育系统人类行为和智能,将简单地将人纳入算法景观。随着物联网(IoT)与先进的机器人和无人机技术一起出现,人们正在开发半自动和全自动算法系统,这些系统以新的和异构的方式与人类经验交叉。由于算法“逻辑”的限制,许多新技术还不够灵活,无法支持人们在日常生活中所需要的选择,这些“逻辑”将选择限制在程序员设想的预定路径上。这极大地限制了人类的能动性,以及目前克服过程中出现的问题的潜力。在这个混合使用时期,我们有机会开发新的方法,将道德指导作为机器可以学习的知识。我们探索通过以下方式促进将基于道德的原则嵌入到自动化环境中:(1)开发相互同意的自动化外部道德审查系统(人工或其他),评估多个道德准则的一致性,并就一致性的分布向设计师、代理和用户提供反馈;(2)专注于审查系统,通过响应这些反馈,通过动态适应或增量发布来开发持续的纠正,从而推动个人服务中嵌入式道德原则的分布式开发;(3)利用多智能体仿真工具对场景进行实时预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A semi-automated food voting classification system: Combining user interaction and Support Vector Machines Vision for secure home robots: Implementation of two-factor authentication The future of computing — The implications for society of technology forecasting and the Kurzweil singularity mAgriculture among pastoralist communities: A case of livestock farmers in kenyan arid and semi-arid lands Study on content rating and security permissions of mobile applications in google play
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1