Probing Pocket Depth and Clinical Attachment Level between Non-Surgical and Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Chronic Periodontitis Patients: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Harish Shah, Shivalal Sharma, K. Goel, Sajeev Shrestha, S. Niraula
{"title":"Probing Pocket Depth and Clinical Attachment Level between Non-Surgical and Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Chronic Periodontitis Patients: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial","authors":"Harish Shah, Shivalal Sharma, K. Goel, Sajeev Shrestha, S. Niraula","doi":"10.3126/JNSPOI.V2I2.23611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: : Chronic periodontitis is one of the most common form of periodontal diseases which either require non-surgical periodontal therapy or open flap debridement-surgical therapy or both. To date, it is unclear as of how much changes occur after NSPT or OFD and which therapy provides the best outcome in chronic periodontitis having probing pocket depth ≥ 5-7 mm. \nAim: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the Probing Pocket Depth and Clinical Attachment Level between NSPT and OFD in chronic periodontitis patients. \nMaterials and Methods: A total of 52 healthy patients with PPD ≥ 5-7 mm were included in the present study. Half of the patients assigned for the NSPT and half in the OFD group. The PPD and CAL were measured at baseline, three and six months. Independent sample t-test was used to compare the change in mean PPD and CAL between NSPT and OFD group at three and six months, respectively. \nResults: The difference in the mean decrease of PPD between NSPT and OFD group at three and six months were 0.15 mm (P<0.05) and 0.19 mm (P<0.05), respectively. The difference in the mean gain of CAL between NSPT and OFD group at three and six months were 0.03 mm (p>0.05) and 0.12 mm (P<0.05), respectively. \nConclusion: Substantial improvement in periodontal status occurred with both the therapies, however, significantly higher decrease in PPD and gain in CAL were seen with surgical therapy.","PeriodicalId":282202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalese Society of Periodontology and Oral Implantology","volume":"142 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalese Society of Periodontology and Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/JNSPOI.V2I2.23611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: : Chronic periodontitis is one of the most common form of periodontal diseases which either require non-surgical periodontal therapy or open flap debridement-surgical therapy or both. To date, it is unclear as of how much changes occur after NSPT or OFD and which therapy provides the best outcome in chronic periodontitis having probing pocket depth ≥ 5-7 mm.
Aim: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the Probing Pocket Depth and Clinical Attachment Level between NSPT and OFD in chronic periodontitis patients.
Materials and Methods: A total of 52 healthy patients with PPD ≥ 5-7 mm were included in the present study. Half of the patients assigned for the NSPT and half in the OFD group. The PPD and CAL were measured at baseline, three and six months. Independent sample t-test was used to compare the change in mean PPD and CAL between NSPT and OFD group at three and six months, respectively.
Results: The difference in the mean decrease of PPD between NSPT and OFD group at three and six months were 0.15 mm (P<0.05) and 0.19 mm (P<0.05), respectively. The difference in the mean gain of CAL between NSPT and OFD group at three and six months were 0.03 mm (p>0.05) and 0.12 mm (P<0.05), respectively.
Conclusion: Substantial improvement in periodontal status occurred with both the therapies, however, significantly higher decrease in PPD and gain in CAL were seen with surgical therapy.
背景:慢性牙周炎是最常见的牙周病之一,需要非手术牙周治疗或开瓣清创术联合手术治疗,或两者兼而有之。迄今为止,对于探测袋深度≥5- 7mm的慢性牙周炎患者,尚不清楚NSPT或OFD后会发生多少变化,以及哪种治疗方法能提供最好的结果。目的:本随机对照临床试验的目的是评估NSPT和OFD在慢性牙周炎患者的探诊袋深度和临床依恋水平。材料与方法:本研究共纳入52例PPD≥5-7 mm的健康患者。一半的患者被分配到NSPT组,一半被分配到OFD组。分别在基线、3个月和6个月测量PPD和CAL。采用独立样本t检验比较NSPT组和OFD组分别在3个月和6个月时的平均PPD和CAL的变化。结果:NSPT组与OFD组在3个月和6个月时PPD的平均降幅分别为0.15 mm (P0.05)和0.12 mm (P<0.05)。结论:两种治疗方法均可显著改善牙周状况,但手术治疗可显著降低PPD和增加CAL。