A Hierarchical Approach for the Verification and Validation of Tolerance Analysis Models

Paul Schaechtl, B. Schleich, S. Wartzack
{"title":"A Hierarchical Approach for the Verification and Validation of Tolerance Analysis Models","authors":"Paul Schaechtl, B. Schleich, S. Wartzack","doi":"10.1115/imece2022-91890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Established tolerance analysis methods are capable of predicting the effects of geometrical part variations on the quality of products and hence virtually assuring their functionality. However, assumptions and simplifications are often made, which can lead to decisive uncertainties. To omit a significant effect of these uncertainties on the overall model and on the obtained results, both a virtual assessment of the model as well as an experimental validation are necessary. The current state of the art still lacks suitable methods and metrics to reliably evaluate the results of tolerance analyses. In addition, an approach is needed to investigate and evaluate the effects of uncertainties within the analysis model on the overall model. The aim of this contribution is therefore to derive statements about the suitability and significance of methods and metrics of verification and validation for evaluating simulation models and their feasibility in the context of tolerance analysis. First, general methods and metrics for the evaluation of simulation results are presented. Subsequently, the most promising ones are customized in an unifying approach. The statistical tolerance analysis of a 3-D-printed non-assembly mechanism in motion serves as an explanatory example for highlighting the procedure and the current challenges and constraints. Finally, the findings are critically discussed and as a result, statements about the further need for action are presented.","PeriodicalId":113474,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2B: Advanced Manufacturing","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2B: Advanced Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2022-91890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Established tolerance analysis methods are capable of predicting the effects of geometrical part variations on the quality of products and hence virtually assuring their functionality. However, assumptions and simplifications are often made, which can lead to decisive uncertainties. To omit a significant effect of these uncertainties on the overall model and on the obtained results, both a virtual assessment of the model as well as an experimental validation are necessary. The current state of the art still lacks suitable methods and metrics to reliably evaluate the results of tolerance analyses. In addition, an approach is needed to investigate and evaluate the effects of uncertainties within the analysis model on the overall model. The aim of this contribution is therefore to derive statements about the suitability and significance of methods and metrics of verification and validation for evaluating simulation models and their feasibility in the context of tolerance analysis. First, general methods and metrics for the evaluation of simulation results are presented. Subsequently, the most promising ones are customized in an unifying approach. The statistical tolerance analysis of a 3-D-printed non-assembly mechanism in motion serves as an explanatory example for highlighting the procedure and the current challenges and constraints. Finally, the findings are critically discussed and as a result, statements about the further need for action are presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公差分析模型的层次验证方法
已建立的公差分析方法能够预测几何零件变化对产品质量的影响,从而几乎保证其功能。然而,假设和简化往往会导致决定性的不确定性。为了忽略这些不确定性对整个模型和所得结果的显著影响,模型的虚拟评估和实验验证都是必要的。目前的技术水平仍然缺乏合适的方法和指标来可靠地评估公差分析的结果。此外,还需要一种方法来调查和评估分析模型中的不确定性对整体模型的影响。因此,这一贡献的目的是得出关于评估模拟模型及其在公差分析背景下的可行性的验证和确认方法和度量的适用性和重要性的陈述。首先,给出了评价仿真结果的一般方法和指标。随后,用统一的方法对最有前途的那些进行定制。对运动中的三维打印非装配机构的统计公差分析作为一个解释性的例子,突出了该过程以及当前的挑战和限制。最后,对调查结果进行了批判性的讨论,并因此提出了关于进一步采取行动的必要性的说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Methodology for Digital Twins of Product Lifecycle Supported by Digital Thread Thermal Analysis and Design of Self-Heating Molds Using Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing for Out-of-Autoclave Applications Conveyer-Less Matrix Assembly Layout Design to Maximize Labor Productivity and Footprint Usage A Comparative Numerical Investigation on Machining of Laminated and 3D Printed CFRP Composites Modelling of Surface Roughness in CO2 Laser Ablation of Aluminium-Coated Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1