F23 Impulsivity and irritability in huntington’s disease: a common foundation?

D. McLauchlan, D. Linden, A. Rosser
{"title":"F23 Impulsivity and irritability in huntington’s disease: a common foundation?","authors":"D. McLauchlan, D. Linden, A. Rosser","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2021-ehdn.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Impulsive and irritable behaviour have been reported in HD from the earliest clinical descriptions of the condition, and abnormalities on various measures of impulsive behaviour have been demonstrated. However these studies had small sample sizes, and did not account for potential confounding effects in the HD population such as IQ and medication. Furthermore, the links between impulsive and irritable behaviour in HD remain unclear. Aims Determine which cognitive mechanisms contribute to irritable behaviour in HD Determine which aspects of impulsive behaviour are seen in HD Methods/Techniques We recruited HD patients and familial controls from the South Wales HD Service and performed a battery of established and novel cognitive tasks, including questionnaire measures of impulsive behavour and irritability (UPPSP, Barrett Impulsivity Scale, PBAs and Snaith), motor inhibition (stop signal task), delay discounting (Kirby instrument) and cognitive impulsivity (Iowa Gambling task). We also performed tasks of provocation (a previously reported task, and a novel task) to determine the relative contributions of impaired inhibition and excessive response to provocation in mediating irritability in HD. Results We recruited 51 HD patients and 26 controls. We found differences in response to provocation and also impaired motor inhibition on the stop signal task in the HD population, even after correcting for relevant confounders such as IQ, medication, motor impairment and psychiatric comorbidity. However, only the response to provocation was associated with irritability in HD. The tasks of delay discounting, and cognitive impulsivity did not demonstrate any differences between HD patients and controls after controlling for relevant confounders. Conclusions Irritability in HD is mediated by excessive response to provocation rather than the known impairments in motor inhibition. Other aspects of impulsivity to contribute to impulsive behaviour in HD.","PeriodicalId":277670,"journal":{"name":"F: Clinical studies: case reports, oberservational studies and trials","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F: Clinical studies: case reports, oberservational studies and trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-ehdn.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Impulsive and irritable behaviour have been reported in HD from the earliest clinical descriptions of the condition, and abnormalities on various measures of impulsive behaviour have been demonstrated. However these studies had small sample sizes, and did not account for potential confounding effects in the HD population such as IQ and medication. Furthermore, the links between impulsive and irritable behaviour in HD remain unclear. Aims Determine which cognitive mechanisms contribute to irritable behaviour in HD Determine which aspects of impulsive behaviour are seen in HD Methods/Techniques We recruited HD patients and familial controls from the South Wales HD Service and performed a battery of established and novel cognitive tasks, including questionnaire measures of impulsive behavour and irritability (UPPSP, Barrett Impulsivity Scale, PBAs and Snaith), motor inhibition (stop signal task), delay discounting (Kirby instrument) and cognitive impulsivity (Iowa Gambling task). We also performed tasks of provocation (a previously reported task, and a novel task) to determine the relative contributions of impaired inhibition and excessive response to provocation in mediating irritability in HD. Results We recruited 51 HD patients and 26 controls. We found differences in response to provocation and also impaired motor inhibition on the stop signal task in the HD population, even after correcting for relevant confounders such as IQ, medication, motor impairment and psychiatric comorbidity. However, only the response to provocation was associated with irritability in HD. The tasks of delay discounting, and cognitive impulsivity did not demonstrate any differences between HD patients and controls after controlling for relevant confounders. Conclusions Irritability in HD is mediated by excessive response to provocation rather than the known impairments in motor inhibition. Other aspects of impulsivity to contribute to impulsive behaviour in HD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
F23亨廷顿舞蹈病的冲动和易怒:共同的基础?
从HD最早的临床描述开始,就有关于冲动和易怒行为的报道,并且已经证明了各种冲动行为的异常。然而,这些研究的样本量很小,并且没有考虑到HD人群中潜在的混杂效应,如智商和药物。此外,HD患者冲动和易怒行为之间的联系尚不清楚。方法/技术我们从南威尔士HD服务中心招募了HD患者和家族对照者,并进行了一系列已建立的和新的认知任务,包括冲动行为和易怒的问卷测量(UPPSP, Barrett冲动性量表,PBAs和Snaith),运动抑制(停止信号任务),延迟贴现(Kirby工具)和认知冲动性(Iowa赌博任务)。我们还执行了挑衅任务(先前报道的任务和一个新任务),以确定抑制受损和对挑衅的过度反应在HD中介导易怒的相对贡献。结果我们招募了51例HD患者和26例对照组。我们发现,即使在校正了相关混杂因素(如智商、药物、运动障碍和精神合并症)后,HD人群在对刺激的反应和停止信号任务的运动抑制受损方面存在差异。然而,只有对挑衅的反应与HD患者的易怒有关。在控制了相关混杂因素后,HD患者和对照组在延迟折扣和认知冲动任务上没有表现出任何差异。结论HD患者的易怒是由对刺激的过度反应介导的,而不是由已知的运动抑制损伤介导的。导致HD患者冲动行为的其他方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
F38 Skill-based dysphagia training as an intervention for individuals with huntington’s disease F32 Exploring the feasibility of a novel and efficient trial design for the evaluation of long-term physical activity and exercise outcomes in people with huntington’s disease F52 Enroll-HD platform biosample resources F15 Visual-cognitive impairment in asymptomatic and symptomatic carriers of huntington’s disease (HD) F09 Late onset huntington’s disease phenotype progression. 2 years follow-up in 220 patients from enroll-HD PDS4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1