Problems of Citizenship and Mexican Immigrants in the United States of America

Miyuki Enari
{"title":"Problems of Citizenship and Mexican Immigrants in the United States of America","authors":"Miyuki Enari","doi":"10.4057/JSR.45.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theoretical framework of this paper is “citizenship” which means the equal status of members of a nation-state as well as the rights and duties attached to that status. Due to the considerable influx and settlement of immigrants into Western countries, protection of citizenship rights has become an issue not only for citizens but also for foreigners residing in the immigrated country. Citizenship includes three elements, that is, civil rights, political rights and social rights. Among these, social rights have increased in importance. T.H. Marshall points out, however, the disparity between the proclaimed equality of citizenship and the existing inequality of social classes.In the United States, qualification for social rights is open to non-citizens, while suffrage is limited to citizens. Yet Mexican immigrants have been treated as outsiders through both the U.S. border control and labor policies. Mexican immigrants have been placed at the bottom of the American social stratum as low wage labor and have experienced harsh social inequality. This reflects the Anglo-centered national formation and the history of discrimination toward non-white people. They are not only stigmatized as a burden of welfare, discriminated as an ethnic minority, but also suspected as illegal immigrants.The American society is faced with a dilemma : On the one hand, immigrants are constantly allowed to come and enjoy more citizenship rights. On the other hand, the exclusiveness based on the nation-state model is still obvious in policies and public opinions. Also, the unequal class relations in accord with ethnicity has been maintained among immigrants, not to mention citizens. To protect equal rights of immigrants, we need to seek a new concept of citizenship and a social movement beyond the nation-state.","PeriodicalId":339300,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Sociological Review","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4057/JSR.45.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The theoretical framework of this paper is “citizenship” which means the equal status of members of a nation-state as well as the rights and duties attached to that status. Due to the considerable influx and settlement of immigrants into Western countries, protection of citizenship rights has become an issue not only for citizens but also for foreigners residing in the immigrated country. Citizenship includes three elements, that is, civil rights, political rights and social rights. Among these, social rights have increased in importance. T.H. Marshall points out, however, the disparity between the proclaimed equality of citizenship and the existing inequality of social classes.In the United States, qualification for social rights is open to non-citizens, while suffrage is limited to citizens. Yet Mexican immigrants have been treated as outsiders through both the U.S. border control and labor policies. Mexican immigrants have been placed at the bottom of the American social stratum as low wage labor and have experienced harsh social inequality. This reflects the Anglo-centered national formation and the history of discrimination toward non-white people. They are not only stigmatized as a burden of welfare, discriminated as an ethnic minority, but also suspected as illegal immigrants.The American society is faced with a dilemma : On the one hand, immigrants are constantly allowed to come and enjoy more citizenship rights. On the other hand, the exclusiveness based on the nation-state model is still obvious in policies and public opinions. Also, the unequal class relations in accord with ethnicity has been maintained among immigrants, not to mention citizens. To protect equal rights of immigrants, we need to seek a new concept of citizenship and a social movement beyond the nation-state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国公民身份和墨西哥移民问题
本文的理论框架是“公民权”,即民族国家成员的平等地位及其所附带的权利和义务。由于大量移民涌入和定居西方国家,公民权利的保护不仅成为公民的问题,而且成为居住在移民国家的外国人的问题。公民身份包括三个要素,即公民权利、政治权利和社会权利。其中,社会权利日益重要。然而,T.H.马歇尔指出,宣称的公民权平等与现存的社会阶级不平等之间存在差异。在美国,享有社会权利的资格对非公民开放,而选举权仅限于公民。然而,在美国的边境管制和劳工政策中,墨西哥移民一直被视为外人。墨西哥移民作为低薪劳工一直处于美国社会阶层的最底层,经历了严重的社会不平等。这反映了以盎格鲁为中心的民族形成和歧视非白人的历史。他们不仅被污名为福利负担,被歧视为少数民族,而且还被怀疑是非法移民。美国社会面临两难境地:一方面,移民不断被允许进入美国,享受更多的公民权利。另一方面,基于民族国家模式的排他性在政策和舆论上仍然很明显。此外,在移民中,不平等的阶级关系也一直存在,公民也不例外。为了保障移民的平等权利,我们需要寻求一种新的公民概念和超越民族国家的社会运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
井上慧真著『若者支援の日英比較――社会関係資本の観点から』 作田誠一郎著『近代日本の少年非行史――「不良少年」観に関する歴史社会学的研究』 Nurse’s View of Life and Death as Peaceful Death 書評:小倉充夫・舩田クラーセンさやか著『解放と暴力――植民地支配とアフリカの現在――』 石井香江著『電話交換手はなぜ「女の仕事」になったのか――技術とジェンダーの日独比較社会史』
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1