A survey on multi-criteria decision making approaches

Umm-e-Habiba, S. Asghar
{"title":"A survey on multi-criteria decision making approaches","authors":"Umm-e-Habiba, S. Asghar","doi":"10.1109/ICET.2009.5353151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past few decades, decision-making has gained popularity due to its frequent implications in managerial domains as it enables decision makers to come up with preeminent decisions. This explicit the importance of improved decision making processes given the competitive and dynamic business environment these days. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) — a well known decision making process is based on the progression of using methods and procedures of multiple conflicting criteria into management planning processes, whereas, Decision Support Systems (DSS) are considered powerful tools for decision-making. MCDM is widely used in conjunction with Decision support systems (DSS) by a large number of decision makers in variety of fields, such as financial analysis, flood risk management, housing evaluation, disaster management and Customer relationship management. Apart from several diversified advantages of using MCDM-DSS architecture, certain issues are also attached to this highly useful decision-making methodology. The main objective of this study is to provide critical evaluation by reviewing and synthesizing the available literature on MCDM-DSS architecture. This study will act as a landmark in providing in-depth knowledge on strength and weaknesses of several models and methodologies reviewed for articulation of this study.","PeriodicalId":307661,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Emerging Technologies","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET.2009.5353151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

Over the past few decades, decision-making has gained popularity due to its frequent implications in managerial domains as it enables decision makers to come up with preeminent decisions. This explicit the importance of improved decision making processes given the competitive and dynamic business environment these days. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) — a well known decision making process is based on the progression of using methods and procedures of multiple conflicting criteria into management planning processes, whereas, Decision Support Systems (DSS) are considered powerful tools for decision-making. MCDM is widely used in conjunction with Decision support systems (DSS) by a large number of decision makers in variety of fields, such as financial analysis, flood risk management, housing evaluation, disaster management and Customer relationship management. Apart from several diversified advantages of using MCDM-DSS architecture, certain issues are also attached to this highly useful decision-making methodology. The main objective of this study is to provide critical evaluation by reviewing and synthesizing the available literature on MCDM-DSS architecture. This study will act as a landmark in providing in-depth knowledge on strength and weaknesses of several models and methodologies reviewed for articulation of this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多准则决策方法综述
在过去的几十年里,决策因其在管理领域的频繁影响而受到欢迎,因为它使决策者能够提出卓越的决策。这表明了在当今竞争激烈、充满活力的商业环境下,改进决策过程的重要性。多标准决策(MCDM) -一个众所周知的决策过程是基于使用多个相互冲突的标准的方法和程序进入管理计划过程的进展,而决策支持系统(DSS)被认为是决策的强大工具。MCDM与决策支持系统(DSS)被大量决策者广泛应用于金融分析、洪水风险管理、房屋评估、灾害管理和客户关系管理等各个领域。除了使用MCDM-DSS架构的多种优势外,这种非常有用的决策方法也附带了一些问题。本研究的主要目的是通过回顾和综合有关MCDM-DSS架构的现有文献来提供批判性评估。这项研究将作为一个里程碑,提供深入了解几个模型和方法的优缺点,以阐明本研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis and verification of Two-Phase Commit & Three-Phase Commit Protocols New innovations in healthcare delivery and laparoscopic surgery in Pakistan An invisible dual watermarking scheme for authentication and copyrights protection Efficient metadata loading algorithm for generation and parsing of health level 7 version 3 messages A Self Organizing Map based Urdu Nasakh character recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1