Rule randomization for propositional logic-based workflow verification

Q. Liang, S. Rubin
{"title":"Rule randomization for propositional logic-based workflow verification","authors":"Q. Liang, S. Rubin","doi":"10.1109/IRI.2008.4583060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workflow verification has been a well studied research topic during the past few years. Theorem proof based approaches to workflow verification become popular due to several advantages including being based on formal characterization with rigorous and non-ambiguous inference mechanisms. However, a common problem to these inference mechanisms is combinatorial explosions, which forms a major performance hurdle to workflow verification systems based on inference. In this paper, we study how randomization enables reuse and reduces processing time in logic based workflow verification approaches. We, in particular, look at a propositional logic based workflow verification technique. For the logic inference rules, which are used to infer new truthful propositions from existing truthful propositions in this logic, we apply randomization to the inference rules after each verification task such that new inference rules reflecting the componentized verification are added to the inference rule sets. We reviewed the savings incurred in verifying a workflow pattern and provide a theoretical analysis.","PeriodicalId":169554,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration","volume":"97 38","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI.2008.4583060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Workflow verification has been a well studied research topic during the past few years. Theorem proof based approaches to workflow verification become popular due to several advantages including being based on formal characterization with rigorous and non-ambiguous inference mechanisms. However, a common problem to these inference mechanisms is combinatorial explosions, which forms a major performance hurdle to workflow verification systems based on inference. In this paper, we study how randomization enables reuse and reduces processing time in logic based workflow verification approaches. We, in particular, look at a propositional logic based workflow verification technique. For the logic inference rules, which are used to infer new truthful propositions from existing truthful propositions in this logic, we apply randomization to the inference rules after each verification task such that new inference rules reflecting the componentized verification are added to the inference rule sets. We reviewed the savings incurred in verifying a workflow pattern and provide a theoretical analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于命题逻辑的工作流验证规则随机化
在过去的几年中,工作流验证一直是一个研究得很好的研究课题。基于定理证明的工作流验证方法之所以流行,是因为它有几个优点,包括基于具有严格和非模糊推理机制的形式化表征。然而,这些推理机制的一个共同问题是组合爆炸,这构成了基于推理的工作流验证系统的主要性能障碍。在本文中,我们研究了随机化如何在基于逻辑的工作流验证方法中实现重用和减少处理时间。我们特别关注基于命题逻辑的工作流验证技术。对于逻辑推理规则,用于从该逻辑中已有的真实命题中推断出新的真实命题,我们在每个验证任务后对推理规则进行随机化处理,从而将反映组件化验证的新推理规则添加到推理规则集中。我们回顾了验证工作流模式所带来的节省,并提供了理论分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An unsupervised protein sequences clustering algorithm using functional domain information FACT: A fusion architecture with contract templates for semantic and syntactic integration Data component based management of reservoir simulation models RFID composite event definition and detection Analysis methodology for project design utilizing UML
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1