Die proklische Diotima

Jana Schultz
{"title":"Die proklische Diotima","authors":"Jana Schultz","doi":"10.1075/bpjam.00040.sch","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDiotima, the priestess of Plato’s Symposium, is an important reference for Proclus’ thinking about the role of women in philosophical and religious practices. This character does not just offer Proclus an example for women’s ability to attain the same level of virtue than men, but she is also a model for the joint work of philosophical and religious practices. Thereby she stands for practices which are orientated on the human condition and therefore depend on intermediary entities as demons, and for practices which transcend both the human condition and the intermediary entities. Most interesting in Proclus’ presentation of Diotima as a priestess and a philosopher is that he does not present her to fulfill these roles by masculinizing her soul through a sole focus on the intelligible entities – as for example Porphyry advises his wife Marcella – but by using the female element in her soul, i.e. the circuit of the Different, as an intermediate through which she can get in touch with the demons and – through them – also with higher entities. The ideal which Diotima incorporates is therefore not becoming masculine (despite having a female body) but harmonizing the male and female elements within the soul.","PeriodicalId":165187,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00040.sch","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diotima, the priestess of Plato’s Symposium, is an important reference for Proclus’ thinking about the role of women in philosophical and religious practices. This character does not just offer Proclus an example for women’s ability to attain the same level of virtue than men, but she is also a model for the joint work of philosophical and religious practices. Thereby she stands for practices which are orientated on the human condition and therefore depend on intermediary entities as demons, and for practices which transcend both the human condition and the intermediary entities. Most interesting in Proclus’ presentation of Diotima as a priestess and a philosopher is that he does not present her to fulfill these roles by masculinizing her soul through a sole focus on the intelligible entities – as for example Porphyry advises his wife Marcella – but by using the female element in her soul, i.e. the circuit of the Different, as an intermediate through which she can get in touch with the demons and – through them – also with higher entities. The ideal which Diotima incorporates is therefore not becoming masculine (despite having a female body) but harmonizing the male and female elements within the soul.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期迪奥蒂玛
狄奥提玛,柏拉图《会饮篇》中的女祭司,是普罗克劳斯思考女性在哲学和宗教实践中的角色的重要参考。这个角色不仅为普罗克劳斯提供了一个例子,说明女性有能力达到与男性相同的美德水平,而且她也是哲学和宗教实践共同工作的典范。因此,她代表了以人类条件为导向的实践,因此依赖于作为恶魔的中介实体,以及超越人类条件和中介实体的实践。最有趣的玛表示狄奥提玛的女祭司和一个哲学家,他不存在她履行这些角色通过生育她的灵魂唯一关注理解实体——例如斑岩建议他的妻子玛塞拉——但通过女性在她的灵魂元素,即电路的不同,作为一个中间,她可以通过接触鬼——通过他们——也与更高的实体。因此,狄奥提玛所融合的理想并不是变得男性化(尽管拥有女性的身体),而是在灵魂中协调男性和女性元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A late medieval zeitgeist analysis Kritik über Überweg, Cesalli & Hartung (): Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie & Imbach, Schulthess, Cesalli, Imbach, de Libera, Ricklin & Heller (2021): Die Philosophie des Mittelalters Questioning … Arbogast Schmitt Antiochus’ and Cicero’s different theories of memory in the Lucullus Kritik über Flashar (2020): Hellenistische Philosophie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1