The biopolitics of ‘Italian theory’ and ‘community’ discourses: Focusing on Agamben and Esposito

M. Park
{"title":"The biopolitics of ‘Italian theory’ and ‘community’ discourses: Focusing on Agamben and Esposito","authors":"M. Park","doi":"10.19116/theory.2023.28.2.171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Esposito’s “immune paradigm” and Agamben’s concepts of “Homo sacer” and “biosecurity” have gained increasing attention in the wake of the coronavirus 2019 pandemic. The biopolitics presented by these Italian philosophers has been discussed actively on a global scale and not merely in the Italian context. This study aims to examine whether Agamben and Esposito’s discourse on community can be universalized. Agamben and Esposito represent the individuality and non-mainstreamness of Italian philosophy, called “Italian theory,” which Negri visualized in The Italian Difference in 2005. This is different from the so-called European universal philosophy. To this end, this study examines the individuality and non-mainstreamness of Italian philosophy in the construction of modern philosophy as well as the boundaries and characteristics of what is now known as “Italian theory.” It further discusses the ways in which Agamben and Esposito’s collective discourse, which represents it, has been discussed on a global scale.","PeriodicalId":409687,"journal":{"name":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2023.28.2.171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Esposito’s “immune paradigm” and Agamben’s concepts of “Homo sacer” and “biosecurity” have gained increasing attention in the wake of the coronavirus 2019 pandemic. The biopolitics presented by these Italian philosophers has been discussed actively on a global scale and not merely in the Italian context. This study aims to examine whether Agamben and Esposito’s discourse on community can be universalized. Agamben and Esposito represent the individuality and non-mainstreamness of Italian philosophy, called “Italian theory,” which Negri visualized in The Italian Difference in 2005. This is different from the so-called European universal philosophy. To this end, this study examines the individuality and non-mainstreamness of Italian philosophy in the construction of modern philosophy as well as the boundaries and characteristics of what is now known as “Italian theory.” It further discusses the ways in which Agamben and Esposito’s collective discourse, which represents it, has been discussed on a global scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“意大利理论”和“共同体”话语的生命政治:以阿甘本和埃斯波西托为中心
在2019年冠状病毒大流行之后,埃斯波西托的“免疫范式”和阿甘本的“Homo sacer”和“生物安全”概念越来越受到关注。这些意大利哲学家提出的生命政治在全球范围内得到了积极的讨论,而不仅仅是在意大利的背景下。本研究旨在探讨阿甘本和埃斯波西托关于社区的论述是否具有普遍性。阿甘本和埃斯波西托代表了意大利哲学的个性和非主流,被称为“意大利理论”,内格里在2005年的《意大利差异》中将其具体化。这与所谓的欧洲普遍哲学不同。为此,本研究考察了意大利哲学在现代哲学建构中的个体性和非主流性,以及现在被称为“意大利理论”的界限和特征。它进一步讨论了代表它的阿甘本和埃斯波西托的集体话语在全球范围内被讨论的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Everything, Everywhere, All at Once in the Deleuzean Light of Pure Becoming and Affect On the Creative Evolution of Modern Literature:Reading Austerlitz Revisiting the Realism/Modernism Debate: Marxist Thought and the Ethics of Representation Huxley’s Vision of Gender Utopia and the Philosopher-Ruled State in The Brave New World Judith Butler and the Ethics and Politic of Bodies: Vulnerability, Precarity, and Open Solidarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1