Introduction to the Special Issue on the Lifecycle of IoT (In)security

Paul Shomo, Sebastián Echeverría, J. Sowell
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on the Lifecycle of IoT (In)security","authors":"Paul Shomo, Sebastián Echeverría, J. Sowell","doi":"10.1145/3569901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The editors of Digital Threats Research and Practice (DTRAP) are excited to bring readers this special issue on Internet of Things (IoT) security. Here, a diverse mixture of cybersecurity academics and industry practitioners have authored articles spanning vulnerabilities in encryption protocols, MAC-layer spoofing protection, shared IoT responsibility models, and industry issues around multimodal deployments. IoT security can be an alarming problem, as devices are often deeply embedded in our hospitals, vehicles, and infrastructure. IoT security is unique in that device manufacturers typically experience heavy downward cost-per-unit pressures, keeping the cybersecurity functionality in hardware and firmware scaled down as well. Heterogenous networks, hardware often leased in the cloud, and hyper-connected environments spanning multiple parties make cybersecurity a team sport. Today, shared responsibility models are a hot topic. The cloud industry has evolved well-defined security responsibilities between infrastructure providers, like Amazon, and tenant companies leasing infrastructure to deploy technologies within. Unfortunately, shared responsibility models around IoT ecosystems have been lacking. It is fitting that our first article, “Emerging Cybersecurity Capability Gaps in the Industrial Internet of Things: Overview and Research Agenda,” tackles the problem of a shared responsibility model in IoT. It presents an assessment of capability gaps based on a series of workshops with 100 expert participants. It presents comprehensive needs against the NIST framework and includes research that models the division of cybersecurity responsibility across the IoT device, network, and cloud resident data, impacting the full lifecycle. MAC-layer spoofing is a serious problem in wireless systems, and scaled-down IoT devices often lack any prevention and detection capabilities. “Randomized Moving Target Approach for MAC-layer Spoofing Detection and Prevention in IoT Systems” details a novel system combing signal-level device fingerprinting with the principles of Randomized Moving Target Defense (RMTD).","PeriodicalId":202552,"journal":{"name":"Digital Threats: Research and Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Threats: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3569901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The editors of Digital Threats Research and Practice (DTRAP) are excited to bring readers this special issue on Internet of Things (IoT) security. Here, a diverse mixture of cybersecurity academics and industry practitioners have authored articles spanning vulnerabilities in encryption protocols, MAC-layer spoofing protection, shared IoT responsibility models, and industry issues around multimodal deployments. IoT security can be an alarming problem, as devices are often deeply embedded in our hospitals, vehicles, and infrastructure. IoT security is unique in that device manufacturers typically experience heavy downward cost-per-unit pressures, keeping the cybersecurity functionality in hardware and firmware scaled down as well. Heterogenous networks, hardware often leased in the cloud, and hyper-connected environments spanning multiple parties make cybersecurity a team sport. Today, shared responsibility models are a hot topic. The cloud industry has evolved well-defined security responsibilities between infrastructure providers, like Amazon, and tenant companies leasing infrastructure to deploy technologies within. Unfortunately, shared responsibility models around IoT ecosystems have been lacking. It is fitting that our first article, “Emerging Cybersecurity Capability Gaps in the Industrial Internet of Things: Overview and Research Agenda,” tackles the problem of a shared responsibility model in IoT. It presents an assessment of capability gaps based on a series of workshops with 100 expert participants. It presents comprehensive needs against the NIST framework and includes research that models the division of cybersecurity responsibility across the IoT device, network, and cloud resident data, impacting the full lifecycle. MAC-layer spoofing is a serious problem in wireless systems, and scaled-down IoT devices often lack any prevention and detection capabilities. “Randomized Moving Target Approach for MAC-layer Spoofing Detection and Prevention in IoT Systems” details a novel system combing signal-level device fingerprinting with the principles of Randomized Moving Target Defense (RMTD).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IoT (In)安全生命周期特刊简介
数字威胁研究与实践(DTRAP)的编辑很高兴为读者带来这一期关于物联网(IoT)安全的特刊。在这里,网络安全学者和行业从业者撰写了各种各样的文章,涵盖了加密协议漏洞、mac层欺骗保护、共享物联网责任模型以及围绕多模式部署的行业问题。物联网安全可能是一个令人担忧的问题,因为设备通常深深嵌入我们的医院、车辆和基础设施中。物联网安全的独特之处在于,设备制造商通常会面临沉重的单位成本下降压力,同时也会降低硬件和固件中的网络安全功能。异构网络、通常在云中租用的硬件以及跨越多方的超连接环境使网络安全成为一项团队运动。今天,共同责任模式是一个热门话题。云计算行业在基础设施提供商(如Amazon)和租赁基础设施以在其中部署技术的租户公司之间发展了明确定义的安全责任。不幸的是,围绕物联网生态系统的共同责任模型一直缺乏。我们的第一篇文章《工业物联网中出现的网络安全能力差距:概述和研究议程》解决了物联网中共同责任模型的问题,这是合适的。它提出了一个基于100名专家参加的一系列讲习班的能力差距评估。它针对NIST框架提出了全面的需求,并包括对影响整个生命周期的物联网设备、网络和云驻留数据的网络安全责任划分进行建模的研究。mac层欺骗是无线系统中的一个严重问题,而按比例缩小的物联网设备通常缺乏任何预防和检测能力。“物联网系统中mac层欺骗检测和预防的随机移动目标方法”详细介绍了一种将信号级设备指纹与随机移动目标防御(RMTD)原理相结合的新系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Causal Inconsistencies are Normal in Windows Memory Dumps (too) InvesTEE: A TEE-supported Framework for Lawful Remote Forensic Investigations Does Cyber Insurance promote Cyber Security Best Practice? An Analysis based on Insurance Application Forms Unveiling Cyber Threat Actors: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Behavior-based Attribution A Framework for Enhancing Social Media Misinformation Detection with Topical-Tactics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1