Rumor source detection with multiple observations: fundamental limits and algorithms

Zhaoxu Wang, Wenxiang Dong, Wenyi Zhang, C. Tan
{"title":"Rumor source detection with multiple observations: fundamental limits and algorithms","authors":"Zhaoxu Wang, Wenxiang Dong, Wenyi Zhang, C. Tan","doi":"10.1145/2591971.2591993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the problem of a single rumor source detection with multiple observations, from a statistical point of view of a spreading over a network, based on the susceptible-infectious model. For tree networks, multiple sequential observations for one single instance of rumor spreading cannot improve over the initial snapshot observation. The situation dramatically improves for multiple independent observations. We propose a unified inference framework based on the union rumor centrality, and provide explicit detection performance for degree-regular tree networks. Surprisingly, even with merely two observations, the detection probability at least doubles that of a single observation, and further approaches one, i.e., reliable detection, with increasing degree. This indicates that a richer diversity enhances detectability. For general graphs, a detection algorithm using a breadth-first search strategy is also proposed and evaluated. Besides rumor source detection, our results can be used in network forensics to combat recurring epidemic-like information spreading such as online anomaly and fraudulent email spams.","PeriodicalId":306456,"journal":{"name":"Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"130","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2591971.2591993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 130

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of a single rumor source detection with multiple observations, from a statistical point of view of a spreading over a network, based on the susceptible-infectious model. For tree networks, multiple sequential observations for one single instance of rumor spreading cannot improve over the initial snapshot observation. The situation dramatically improves for multiple independent observations. We propose a unified inference framework based on the union rumor centrality, and provide explicit detection performance for degree-regular tree networks. Surprisingly, even with merely two observations, the detection probability at least doubles that of a single observation, and further approaches one, i.e., reliable detection, with increasing degree. This indicates that a richer diversity enhances detectability. For general graphs, a detection algorithm using a breadth-first search strategy is also proposed and evaluated. Besides rumor source detection, our results can be used in network forensics to combat recurring epidemic-like information spreading such as online anomaly and fraudulent email spams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多观测的谣言源检测:基本限制和算法
本文基于易感感染模型,从网络传播的统计角度出发,解决了用多个观测值检测单个谣言源的问题。对于树状网络,对单个谣言传播实例的多个顺序观察不能优于初始快照观察。对于多个独立的观测,这种情况显著改善。提出了一种基于联合谣言中心性的统一推理框架,并为度正则树网络提供了明确的检测性能。令人惊讶的是,即使只有两次观测,探测概率至少是一次观测的两倍,并且随着程度的增加,进一步接近于一次,即可靠的探测。这表明更丰富的多样性提高了可探测性。对于一般图,提出了一种基于宽度优先搜索策略的检测算法,并对其进行了评价。除了谣言来源检测之外,我们的研究结果还可以用于网络取证,以打击在线异常和欺诈性电子邮件垃圾邮件等反复出现的类似流行病的信息传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Queueing delays in buffered multistage interconnection networks Data dissemination performance in large-scale sensor networks Index policies for a multi-class queue with convex holding cost and abandonments Neighbor-cell assisted error correction for MLC NAND flash memories Collecting, organizing, and sharing pins in pinterest: interest-driven or social-driven?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1