{"title":"Can we treat pragmatics like semantics?","authors":"J. M. Barone, P. Dewan","doi":"10.1109/NAFIPS.2002.1018043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last few years, several fuzzy-based approaches to linguistic text analysis have suggested that it is possible to find and to use patterns in the surface structure of linguistic utterances (i.e., pragmatic information) which reveal or conform to deeper linguistic regularities or constructs (Le., semantic information). This paper discusses two of these approaches, the fuzzy semantic typing of Subasic and Huettner and the computational semiotics of Rigger. From a theoretical point of view, such methods have been criticized on both philosophical and linguistic grounds. lit this paper, we perform some simple experiments to see whether useful insights or even useful text processing methods can be gleaned from application of techniques derived from one of these pragmatic approaches (computational semiotics). We conclude that the results are inconsistent and provide neither useful surface measures of regularities nor insights into underlying syntactico-semantic properties of linguistic utterance.","PeriodicalId":348314,"journal":{"name":"2002 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Proceedings. NAFIPS-FLINT 2002 (Cat. No. 02TH8622)","volume":"693 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Proceedings. NAFIPS-FLINT 2002 (Cat. No. 02TH8622)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2002.1018043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the last few years, several fuzzy-based approaches to linguistic text analysis have suggested that it is possible to find and to use patterns in the surface structure of linguistic utterances (i.e., pragmatic information) which reveal or conform to deeper linguistic regularities or constructs (Le., semantic information). This paper discusses two of these approaches, the fuzzy semantic typing of Subasic and Huettner and the computational semiotics of Rigger. From a theoretical point of view, such methods have been criticized on both philosophical and linguistic grounds. lit this paper, we perform some simple experiments to see whether useful insights or even useful text processing methods can be gleaned from application of techniques derived from one of these pragmatic approaches (computational semiotics). We conclude that the results are inconsistent and provide neither useful surface measures of regularities nor insights into underlying syntactico-semantic properties of linguistic utterance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们能像对待语义学一样对待语用学吗?
在过去的几年里,一些基于模糊的语言文本分析方法表明,有可能在语言话语的表面结构(即语用信息)中发现和使用模式,这些模式揭示或符合更深层次的语言规则或结构(Le。语义信息)。本文讨论了其中的两种方法,即subbasic和Huettner的模糊语义类型和Rigger的计算符号学。从理论的角度来看,这种方法在哲学和语言学上都受到了批评。在本文中,我们进行了一些简单的实验,看看是否可以从这些实用方法(计算符号学)的应用中获得有用的见解甚至有用的文本处理方法。我们的结论是,结果是不一致的,既没有提供有用的表面测量规则,也没有深入了解语言话语的潜在句法语义特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fuzzy linear clustering for fabric selection from online database Fuzzy clustering in vision recognition applied in NAVI Fuzzy functions to select an optimal action in decision theory Fuzzy systems and soft O.R Conceptual fuzzy sets-based navigation system for Yahoo!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1