When Electronic Recommendation Agents Backfire: Negative Effects on Choice Satisfaction, Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions

J. Lajos, Amitava Chattopadhyay, K. Sengupta
{"title":"When Electronic Recommendation Agents Backfire: Negative Effects on Choice Satisfaction, Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions","authors":"J. Lajos, Amitava Chattopadhyay, K. Sengupta","doi":"10.1037/e621072012-030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet retailers offer consumers the opportunity to choose from a previously unparalleled selection of products. To help consumers navigate this sea of information, many websites provide electronic recommendation agents that ask users questions about their preferences for product attributes and then rate and rank order the available products on the basis of their responses. In an era in which consumers often feel overwhelmed by choice, previous research has hailed electronic recommendation agents as coming to the rescue by offering a quick and efficient means for consumers to narrow their consideration sets. However, in this article we report the results of an experiment in which use of an electronic recommendation agent negatively impacted participants' long-term choice satisfaction, attitudes, and purchase intentions, in addition to other managerially relevant variables. The data support our hypothesis that use of an electronic recommendation agent leads consumers to overweight utilitarian product attributes and underweight hedonic product attributes in choice.","PeriodicalId":268180,"journal":{"name":"ACR North American Advances","volume":"644 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR North American Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e621072012-030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Internet retailers offer consumers the opportunity to choose from a previously unparalleled selection of products. To help consumers navigate this sea of information, many websites provide electronic recommendation agents that ask users questions about their preferences for product attributes and then rate and rank order the available products on the basis of their responses. In an era in which consumers often feel overwhelmed by choice, previous research has hailed electronic recommendation agents as coming to the rescue by offering a quick and efficient means for consumers to narrow their consideration sets. However, in this article we report the results of an experiment in which use of an electronic recommendation agent negatively impacted participants' long-term choice satisfaction, attitudes, and purchase intentions, in addition to other managerially relevant variables. The data support our hypothesis that use of an electronic recommendation agent leads consumers to overweight utilitarian product attributes and underweight hedonic product attributes in choice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当电子推荐代理适得其反:对选择满意度、态度和购买意向的负面影响
互联网零售商为消费者提供了前所未有的产品选择机会。为了帮助消费者在信息的海洋中导航,许多网站提供电子推荐代理,询问用户对产品属性的偏好,然后根据他们的回答对可用产品进行评级和排序。在一个消费者常常感到被选择淹没的时代,之前的研究称赞电子推荐代理通过为消费者提供一种快速有效的方法来缩小他们的考虑范围,从而拯救了消费者。然而,在这篇文章中,我们报告了一个实验的结果,在这个实验中,除了其他管理相关的变量之外,电子推荐代理的使用对参与者的长期选择满意度、态度和购买意图产生了负面影响。这些数据支持我们的假设,即使用电子推荐代理会导致消费者在选择时过度倾向于功利产品属性,过度倾向于享乐产品属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial behavior among young adult consumers: the influence of self-determination and financial psychology Warm or Cold? The Effect of Color Temperature of Logo on Evaluation of For-Profits and Nonprofits When Sharing Isn’t Caring: The Influence of Seeking The Best on Sharing Favorable Word of Mouth about Unsatisfactory Purchases Birds of a Feather Feel Together: Emotional Ability Similarity in Consumer Interactions Goal Conflict Encourages Work and Discourages Leisure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1