KESESUAIAN PERMENKOMINFO NOMOR 05 TAHUN 2020 DENGAN PRINSIP KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT DAN BEREKSPRESI DALAM HAK ASASI MANUSIA

Ridho Dwi Rahardjo, Wiwik Afifah
{"title":"KESESUAIAN PERMENKOMINFO NOMOR 05 TAHUN 2020 DENGAN PRINSIP KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT DAN BEREKSPRESI DALAM HAK ASASI MANUSIA","authors":"Ridho Dwi Rahardjo, Wiwik Afifah","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i2.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current government can block Electronic System Operators through Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Number 5 of 2020 concerning Private Scope Electronic System Operators. However, this regulation does not regulate in detail. This study aims to find things that must be done whether they are in line with the principles of freedom and expression. By going through a normative approach method with the aim of answering issues based on the scientific side. The results of this study indicate that Permenkominfo No. 5 of 2020 is not in accordance with the principle of freedom of opinion and expression because the regulation related to the phrase \"disturbing\" does not have detailed indicators. So that if the government considers content to be troubling, the government can take repressive measures. Meanwhile, the troubling indicators in this regulation have not yet been developed. This is because freedom of expression and opinion is protected by applicable laws and cannot be contested. And it is necessary to look for new things related to the government's efforts to monitor and provide legal protection for personal data or privacy without limiting the rights of every citizen","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The current government can block Electronic System Operators through Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Number 5 of 2020 concerning Private Scope Electronic System Operators. However, this regulation does not regulate in detail. This study aims to find things that must be done whether they are in line with the principles of freedom and expression. By going through a normative approach method with the aim of answering issues based on the scientific side. The results of this study indicate that Permenkominfo No. 5 of 2020 is not in accordance with the principle of freedom of opinion and expression because the regulation related to the phrase "disturbing" does not have detailed indicators. So that if the government considers content to be troubling, the government can take repressive measures. Meanwhile, the troubling indicators in this regulation have not yet been developed. This is because freedom of expression and opinion is protected by applicable laws and cannot be contested. And it is necessary to look for new things related to the government's efforts to monitor and provide legal protection for personal data or privacy without limiting the rights of every citizen
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020年5号《游行与言论自由和言论自由原则》相一致
现政府可以通过《2020年第5号通讯信息部有关民间电子系统经营者的规定》,限制电子系统经营者。然而,这一规定并没有详细规定。这项研究的目的是找到必须做的事情,无论它们是否符合自由和表达的原则。通过规范的方法,从科学的角度来回答问题。本研究结果表明,2020年第5号条例不符合意见和表达自由原则,因为与“令人不安”一词有关的规定没有详细的指标。因此,如果政府认为内容令人不安,政府可以采取压制措施。同时,这一规定中令人担忧的指标尚未形成。这是因为言论和意见自由受到适用法律的保护,不容质疑。并且有必要寻找与政府在不限制每个公民权利的情况下对个人数据或隐私进行监控和提供法律保护有关的新事物
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MELARIKAN WANITA YANG BELUM CUKUP UMUR PUTUSAN /36/Pid.B/2019 PN GST TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK BERDASARKAN PASAL 310 KUHP ANALISIS HUKUM KEBIJAKAN KELEBIHAN DIMENSI DAN KELEBIHAN MUATAN TERHADAP DEMONSTRAN GERAKAN SOPIR JAWA TIMUR ANALISIS HUKUM KONTEN NEGATIF DI PLATFORM YOUTUBE DI INDONESIA KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA E-LITIGASI BERLANDASKAN NILAI KEADILAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1