Critical Thinking in the Nursing Profession: Analysis with a Socratic Method and Nurse Theorist Philosophy

Badil, Najma Naz, Mehrin Kausor
{"title":"Critical Thinking in the Nursing Profession: Analysis with a Socratic Method and Nurse Theorist Philosophy","authors":"Badil, Najma Naz, Mehrin Kausor","doi":"10.37723/jumdc.v14i1.778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking skills are increasingly imperative skills in the nursing profession. Both the Socratic method and nursing theorist philosophy can lead to enhance critical skills. The Socratic method has been rooted in ancient Greek Philosophy, whereas nursing theorist philosophy in the 21st century. This paper discusses critical thinking in the nursing profession and compares the critical thinking concept with the Socratic Method and nurse theorist philosophy. The prime aim of this study is to compare which method is effectively utilized in the nursing profession. The literature pertinent to the topic was searched using the database library, including PubMed, BioMed, Google Scholar, PakMediNet, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature CINAHL. Literature was searched using keywords including Socratic method, nurse theorist philosophy, critical thinking skills, nursing education, and nursing clinical practice. The full-text article was included in the study. Relevant original articles, systemic reviews, quasi-experimental design, philosophical papers, and cross-sectional studies focusing on nurses' critical thinking skills, the Socratic Method, and nurse theorist philosophy were included. The study analysis portrayed Socratic questioning as primarily embedded in critical thinking concepts which nurses utilized in theoretical knowledge. The Socratic Method is explicitly known as the student-centered method that probes critical thinking in classroom teachings. Critical thinking has become vital in professional accountability and excellent nursing care. Nurse theorists have generally employed critical thinking skills to obtain the maximum patient care outcome. In conclusion, the Socratic method increases critical thinking in academia while nursing’s theorist philosophy in nursing clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":178216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37723/jumdc.v14i1.778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical thinking skills are increasingly imperative skills in the nursing profession. Both the Socratic method and nursing theorist philosophy can lead to enhance critical skills. The Socratic method has been rooted in ancient Greek Philosophy, whereas nursing theorist philosophy in the 21st century. This paper discusses critical thinking in the nursing profession and compares the critical thinking concept with the Socratic Method and nurse theorist philosophy. The prime aim of this study is to compare which method is effectively utilized in the nursing profession. The literature pertinent to the topic was searched using the database library, including PubMed, BioMed, Google Scholar, PakMediNet, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature CINAHL. Literature was searched using keywords including Socratic method, nurse theorist philosophy, critical thinking skills, nursing education, and nursing clinical practice. The full-text article was included in the study. Relevant original articles, systemic reviews, quasi-experimental design, philosophical papers, and cross-sectional studies focusing on nurses' critical thinking skills, the Socratic Method, and nurse theorist philosophy were included. The study analysis portrayed Socratic questioning as primarily embedded in critical thinking concepts which nurses utilized in theoretical knowledge. The Socratic Method is explicitly known as the student-centered method that probes critical thinking in classroom teachings. Critical thinking has become vital in professional accountability and excellent nursing care. Nurse theorists have generally employed critical thinking skills to obtain the maximum patient care outcome. In conclusion, the Socratic method increases critical thinking in academia while nursing’s theorist philosophy in nursing clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业中的批判性思维:苏格拉底方法与护士理论哲学分析
批判性思维技能在护理专业中越来越重要。苏格拉底的方法和护理理论哲学都可以提高关键技能。苏格拉底的方法植根于古希腊哲学,而护理理论哲学则是21世纪的哲学。本文讨论了护理专业中的批判性思维,并将批判性思维概念与苏格拉底方法和护理理论家哲学进行了比较。本研究的主要目的是比较哪种方法在护理专业中有效使用。使用数据库库检索与该主题相关的文献,包括PubMed、BioMed、Google Scholar、PakMediNet和护理与相关健康文献累积索引CINAHL。检索关键词为苏格拉底方法、护理理论哲学、批判性思维技能、护理教育、护理临床实践。全文文章被纳入研究。相关的原创文章、系统综述、准实验设计、哲学论文以及关于护士批判性思维技能、苏格拉底方法和护士理论哲学的横断面研究均被纳入其中。研究分析将苏格拉底式提问描述为主要嵌入护士在理论知识中使用的批判性思维概念。苏格拉底方法被明确地称为以学生为中心的方法,在课堂教学中探索批判性思维。批判性思维在专业问责制和优质护理中变得至关重要。护士理论家通常采用批判性思维技能来获得最大的病人护理结果。总之,苏格拉底方法在学术上增加了批判性思维,而护理理论哲学在护理临床实践中增加了批判性思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online Teaching and its challenges faced by Anatomists in Pakistan: A post-pandemic Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception regarding antibiotic use and its associated resistance among the general public in Lahore, Pakistan. Pause procedure to enhance learning during the lectures in Medical Colleges Impact of transurethral resection of the prostate on erectile function in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients: a descriptive study at a tertiary care hospital Multidisciplinary care plan and adherence to clinical practice guidelines is needed to improve breast cancer outcome in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1