Waiting Children, Forever Families: A Transitivity and Thematic Analysis of Adoption Agency Blog Posts

E. Suh, Na Wu, Katelyn Hemmeke
{"title":"Waiting Children, Forever Families: A Transitivity and Thematic Analysis of Adoption Agency Blog Posts","authors":"E. Suh, Na Wu, Katelyn Hemmeke","doi":"10.1353/ado.2022.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Historically, adoption agencies portrayed international adoption as the salvation of orphans. Our taxonomic and transitivity analysis examines how bloggers on one US-based adoption agency's blog represented adopted persons, adoptive families, birth families, and adoption agencies. Among the seventy-nine international adoption posts examined, bloggers most frequently presented adoptive families and the adoption agency as the social actors engaged in high transitivity verb processes. Verb transitivity conveys a social actor's ability to affect others or situations. Thematic analysis in this essay uncovers how adoptive parents are portrayed as powerful and loving, the adoption agency as a benevolent advocate, and adopted persons as children \"waiting\" and \"in need.\" Birth families were rarely the grammatical subject of sentences and were largely erased from bloggers' adoption narratives. This analysis uncovered how adoptive parents, not adopted persons, were the focus of these adoption narratives, highlighting the need for more nuanced and adopted-person-centered understandings of adoption in such forums.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2022.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Historically, adoption agencies portrayed international adoption as the salvation of orphans. Our taxonomic and transitivity analysis examines how bloggers on one US-based adoption agency's blog represented adopted persons, adoptive families, birth families, and adoption agencies. Among the seventy-nine international adoption posts examined, bloggers most frequently presented adoptive families and the adoption agency as the social actors engaged in high transitivity verb processes. Verb transitivity conveys a social actor's ability to affect others or situations. Thematic analysis in this essay uncovers how adoptive parents are portrayed as powerful and loving, the adoption agency as a benevolent advocate, and adopted persons as children "waiting" and "in need." Birth families were rarely the grammatical subject of sentences and were largely erased from bloggers' adoption narratives. This analysis uncovered how adoptive parents, not adopted persons, were the focus of these adoption narratives, highlighting the need for more nuanced and adopted-person-centered understandings of adoption in such forums.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等待的孩子,永远的家庭:领养机构博客文章的及物性与主题性分析
摘要:历史上,收养机构将国际收养描述为孤儿的拯救。我们的分类学和及物性分析检视了一家美国领养机构博客上的部落客如何代表被领养人、领养家庭、出生家庭和领养机构。在研究的79篇国际收养文章中,博主最常将收养家庭和收养机构描述为参与高及物性动词过程的社会行动者。动词及物性传达了社会行动者影响他人或情境的能力。本文的主题分析揭示了养父母是如何被描绘成强大而充满爱心的,收养机构是如何被描绘成仁慈的倡导者,而被收养的人是如何被描绘成“等待”和“需要”的孩子。出生家庭很少是句子的语法主题,而且在博客的收养叙述中基本上被抹去。这一分析揭示了养父母,而不是被养人,是这些收养叙事的焦点,强调了在这些论坛上对收养有更细致入微和以被养人为中心的理解的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Dobbs Issue Taking Children: A History of American Terror by Laura Briggs, and: Legitimating Life: Adoption in the Age of Globalization and Biotechnology by Sonja van Wichelen (review) Originalism: Erasing Women from the Body Politic Separation, Sorrow, and Silence: What Birth Mothers and Birth Searching in Children’s Literature Can Teach Us About the Abortion v. Adoption Debate The Dobbs Decision and the (False) Adoption “Option,” A Personal Essay of “Ambiguous Loss”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1