Exploring Performance Attribution: The Case of Quality Management Standards Adoption and Business Performance

Gavin P. M. Dick
{"title":"Exploring Performance Attribution: The Case of Quality Management Standards Adoption and Business Performance","authors":"Gavin P. M. Dick","doi":"10.1108/17410400910950991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– Accreditation to the ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems Standard has proven to be a persistent and growing phenomenon in services and manufacturing, yet to date little attempt has been made to explore how performance results in cross‐sectional research may be attributed to different causation mechanisms and how their influences may alter over time. This paper aims to fill this gap., – The paper defines four possible causation mechanisms before searching and analysing the empirical literature on quality management system certification to ISO 9001 and business performance for evidence of their causal influence., – From the analyses, it is found that the benefit that can safely be attributed to the treatment‐effect of ISO 9001 accreditation is lower waste; while the benefits of lower costs and better quality are less likely unless motives for adoption are developmental rather than externally driven. From an analysis of longitudinal studies a strong selection‐mechanism is found where more profitable firms have a greater propensity to adopt than less profitable firms. From the finding propositions are developed to show how the influence of these mechanisms change over time., – The existence of the selection‐mechanism has profound implications for interpreting business performance achievements because the benefits that are attributed to the treatment‐effect from adopting quality management system standards are likely to be greatly inflated by the influence of the selection‐mechanism. The author suggests that richer theory is needed that can incorporate bi‐directional influences and new research is needed to explore the underlying causes of the selection effect., – The paper is believed to be the first to systematically explore attribution of performance in the ISO 9001 literature. Its findings provide new insights into the complexities of attribution of performance in studies of new practices and systems.","PeriodicalId":369181,"journal":{"name":"Operations Strategy eJournal","volume":" 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Strategy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400910950991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

– Accreditation to the ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems Standard has proven to be a persistent and growing phenomenon in services and manufacturing, yet to date little attempt has been made to explore how performance results in cross‐sectional research may be attributed to different causation mechanisms and how their influences may alter over time. This paper aims to fill this gap., – The paper defines four possible causation mechanisms before searching and analysing the empirical literature on quality management system certification to ISO 9001 and business performance for evidence of their causal influence., – From the analyses, it is found that the benefit that can safely be attributed to the treatment‐effect of ISO 9001 accreditation is lower waste; while the benefits of lower costs and better quality are less likely unless motives for adoption are developmental rather than externally driven. From an analysis of longitudinal studies a strong selection‐mechanism is found where more profitable firms have a greater propensity to adopt than less profitable firms. From the finding propositions are developed to show how the influence of these mechanisms change over time., – The existence of the selection‐mechanism has profound implications for interpreting business performance achievements because the benefits that are attributed to the treatment‐effect from adopting quality management system standards are likely to be greatly inflated by the influence of the selection‐mechanism. The author suggests that richer theory is needed that can incorporate bi‐directional influences and new research is needed to explore the underlying causes of the selection effect., – The paper is believed to be the first to systematically explore attribution of performance in the ISO 9001 literature. Its findings provide new insights into the complexities of attribution of performance in studies of new practices and systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绩效归因探讨:质量管理标准采用与企业绩效的案例
- ISO 9001质量管理体系标准认证已被证明是服务业和制造业中持续存在且日益增长的现象,但迄今为止,很少有人尝试探索横截面研究中的绩效结果如何归因于不同的因果机制,以及它们的影响如何随时间变化。本文旨在填补这一空白。——本文定义了四种可能的因果机制,然后对iso9001质量管理体系认证和企业绩效的实证文献进行了检索和分析,以证明它们的因果影响。-从分析中发现,可以安全地归因于ISO 9001认证处理效果的好处是减少了浪费;虽然低成本和高质量的好处不大可能实现,除非采用的动机是发展而不是外部驱动的。从纵向研究的分析中,我们发现了一个强大的选择机制,即利润较高的公司比利润较低的公司更倾向于采用新技术。根据这些发现,提出了表明这些机制的影响如何随时间变化的命题。选择机制的存在对解释企业绩效成就具有深远的影响,因为采用质量管理体系标准所带来的待遇效应很可能被选择机制的影响大大夸大。作者建议,需要更丰富的理论来纳入双向影响,并需要新的研究来探索选择效应的潜在原因。这篇论文被认为是第一个系统地探讨ISO 9001文献中绩效归因的论文。它的发现为研究新实践和新系统的绩效归因的复杂性提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retailers’ product assortment decisions during the Great Recession: Evidence from the U.S. yogurt market Sourcing from a Self-Reporting Supplier: Strategic Communication of Social Responsibility in a Supply Chain Estimating the Demand Spillover Effect of Inventory Stockouts in a Fashion Footwear Retail Setting Blockchain-Enabled Traceability in Food Supply Chain Networks Analyzing Promotion Effectiveness in Fashion Retailing Using Quantile Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1