Algorithms for the selection of the active sensors in distributed tracking: comparison between Frisbee and GNS methods

A. Capponi, C. Pilotto, G. Golino, A. Farina, Lance M. Kaplan
{"title":"Algorithms for the selection of the active sensors in distributed tracking: comparison between Frisbee and GNS methods","authors":"A. Capponi, C. Pilotto, G. Golino, A. Farina, Lance M. Kaplan","doi":"10.1109/ICIF.2006.301592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two different approaches for sensor selection for distributed tracking: 1) the Frisbee method, and 2) global node selection (GNS). The Frisbee method is based on the proximity of the nodes to the predicted location of the target; GNS is based on minimizing the unbiased Cramer Rao lower bound (CRLB). Both theoretical and experimental results indicate that the Frisbee method is as effective as GNS. Furthermore, the Frisbee method is attractive due to its very light computational load","PeriodicalId":248061,"journal":{"name":"2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion","volume":"299 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIF.2006.301592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This paper compares two different approaches for sensor selection for distributed tracking: 1) the Frisbee method, and 2) global node selection (GNS). The Frisbee method is based on the proximity of the nodes to the predicted location of the target; GNS is based on minimizing the unbiased Cramer Rao lower bound (CRLB). Both theoretical and experimental results indicate that the Frisbee method is as effective as GNS. Furthermore, the Frisbee method is attractive due to its very light computational load
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分布式跟踪中主动传感器的选择算法:飞盘与GNS方法的比较
本文比较了两种不同的分布式跟踪传感器选择方法:飞盘法和全局节点选择(GNS)。飞盘方法基于节点与目标预测位置的接近度;GNS基于最小化无偏Cramer - Rao下界(CRLB)。理论和实验结果都表明,飞盘法与GNS法一样有效。此外,飞盘方法由于其非常轻的计算负荷而具有吸引力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhanced Tracking Performance with Signal Amplitude Information of Sensor Networks The Dynamics of Information Fusion: Synthesis Versus Misassociation Efficient Track-to-Task Assignment Using Cluster Analysis Scanpath Analysis of Fused Multi-Sensor Images with Luminance Change: A Pilot Study A Model for a Human Decision-Maker in a Command and Control Radar System: Surveillance Tracking of Multiple Targets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1