Comparison of Technical and Economic Properties of Additively Manufactured Components Using Masked Stereolithography and Fused Layer Modeling

S. Junk, Felix Bär
{"title":"Comparison of Technical and Economic Properties of Additively Manufactured Components Using Masked Stereolithography and Fused Layer Modeling","authors":"S. Junk, Felix Bär","doi":"10.1115/iam2022-94087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Additive manufacturing with plastics enables the production of lightweight and resilient components with a high degree of design freedom. In the low-cost sector, Material Extrusion as Fused Layer Modeling (FLM) has so far been the leading method, as it offers simple 3D printers and a variety of inexpensive 3D materials. However, printing times for 6FLM are very long and dimensional accuracy and surface finish are rather poor. Recently, new processes from the field of Vat Polymerization have appeared on the market, such as masked Stereolithography (mSLA), which offer a significant improvement in component quality and build speed at equally favorable machine costs.\n This paper therefore analyzes the technical and economic capabilities of the two competing additive processes. For this purpose, the achievable dimensional and surface qualities are determined using a test specimen which represents various important geometry elements. In addition, the machine and material costs are determined and compared with each other. Finally, the resulting environmental impact is determined in the form of the CO2 footprint. In order to optimize the strength of the printed components, material properties of the tensile specimens produced additively with mSLA are determined. The use of ABS-like resins will also be investigated to determine optimal processing settings.","PeriodicalId":184278,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Additive Manufacturing Conference","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Additive Manufacturing Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/iam2022-94087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Additive manufacturing with plastics enables the production of lightweight and resilient components with a high degree of design freedom. In the low-cost sector, Material Extrusion as Fused Layer Modeling (FLM) has so far been the leading method, as it offers simple 3D printers and a variety of inexpensive 3D materials. However, printing times for 6FLM are very long and dimensional accuracy and surface finish are rather poor. Recently, new processes from the field of Vat Polymerization have appeared on the market, such as masked Stereolithography (mSLA), which offer a significant improvement in component quality and build speed at equally favorable machine costs. This paper therefore analyzes the technical and economic capabilities of the two competing additive processes. For this purpose, the achievable dimensional and surface qualities are determined using a test specimen which represents various important geometry elements. In addition, the machine and material costs are determined and compared with each other. Finally, the resulting environmental impact is determined in the form of the CO2 footprint. In order to optimize the strength of the printed components, material properties of the tensile specimens produced additively with mSLA are determined. The use of ABS-like resins will also be investigated to determine optimal processing settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用掩膜立体光刻和熔融层建模的增材制造部件的技术和经济性能比较
塑料增材制造能够生产具有高度设计自由度的轻质弹性部件。在低成本领域,材料挤压作为熔融层建模(FLM)迄今为止一直是领先的方法,因为它提供了简单的3D打印机和各种廉价的3D材料。然而,6FLM的印刷时间很长,尺寸精度和表面光洁度相当差。最近,来自还原聚合领域的新工艺已经出现在市场上,例如掩膜立体光刻(mSLA),它在同样有利的机器成本下显著提高了组件质量和构建速度。因此,本文分析了两种相互竞争的增材工艺的技术和经济能力。为此,可实现的尺寸和表面质量是使用代表各种重要几何元素的试样来确定的。此外,机器和材料的成本是确定和相互比较。最后,由此产生的环境影响以二氧化碳足迹的形式确定。为了优化打印部件的强度,测定了用mSLA增材制造的拉伸试样的材料性能。还将研究类abs树脂的使用,以确定最佳的加工设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermal Stability of Additively Manufactured Mar M 509 Temperature Field Monitoring in Fused Filament Fabrication Process Based on Physics-Constrained Dictionary Learning Food Contact Materials: An Analysis of Water Absorption in Nylon 12 3D Printed Parts Using SLS After VaporFuse Surface Treatment Development of Adaptive Toolpaths for Repair and Cladding of Complex 3D Components by Laser Metal Deposition Data-Driven Model Predictive Control for Roll-to-Roll Process Register Error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1