Compression Performance of the Versatile Video Coding: HD and UHD Visual Quality Monitoring

N. Sidaty, W. Hamidouche, O. Déforges, P. Philippe, Jérôme Fournier
{"title":"Compression Performance of the Versatile Video Coding: HD and UHD Visual Quality Monitoring","authors":"N. Sidaty, W. Hamidouche, O. Déforges, P. Philippe, Jérôme Fournier","doi":"10.1109/PCS48520.2019.8954562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Video compression and content quality have become one of the most research topic in the recent years. Predominantly, trends obviously signpost that the video usage over the Internet is on the upsurge. Simultaneously, users’ requirement for enlarged resolution and higher quality is rising. Consequently, a huge effort has been made for video coding technologies and quality monitoring. In this paper, we present a subjective-based comparison as well as an objective measurement between the newest Versatile Video Coding (VVC) and the well-known High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standards. Several videos of various content are selected as tested sequences. Both High Definition (HD) and Ultra High Definition (UHD) resolutions are used in this experiment. An extensive range of bit-rates from low to high bit-rates were selected. These sequences are encoded using both HEVC reference software (HM-16.2) and the latest reference software of VVC (VTM-5.0). Obtained results have shown that VVC outperforms consistently HEVC, for realistic bit rates and quality levels, in the range of 40% on the subjective scale. For the objective measurements, using PSNR, SSIM and VMAF as quality metrics, the quality enhancement of VVC over HEVC is ranging from 31% to 40%, depending on video content and spatial resolution.","PeriodicalId":237809,"journal":{"name":"2019 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCS48520.2019.8954562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Video compression and content quality have become one of the most research topic in the recent years. Predominantly, trends obviously signpost that the video usage over the Internet is on the upsurge. Simultaneously, users’ requirement for enlarged resolution and higher quality is rising. Consequently, a huge effort has been made for video coding technologies and quality monitoring. In this paper, we present a subjective-based comparison as well as an objective measurement between the newest Versatile Video Coding (VVC) and the well-known High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standards. Several videos of various content are selected as tested sequences. Both High Definition (HD) and Ultra High Definition (UHD) resolutions are used in this experiment. An extensive range of bit-rates from low to high bit-rates were selected. These sequences are encoded using both HEVC reference software (HM-16.2) and the latest reference software of VVC (VTM-5.0). Obtained results have shown that VVC outperforms consistently HEVC, for realistic bit rates and quality levels, in the range of 40% on the subjective scale. For the objective measurements, using PSNR, SSIM and VMAF as quality metrics, the quality enhancement of VVC over HEVC is ranging from 31% to 40%, depending on video content and spatial resolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通用视频编码的压缩性能:高清和超高清视觉质量监控
视频压缩和内容质量是近年来研究最多的课题之一。最重要的是,趋势明显表明,互联网上的视频使用正在激增。同时,用户对放大分辨率和更高画质的要求也在不断提高。因此,人们在视频编码技术和质量监控方面做出了巨大的努力。本文对最新的通用视频编码(VVC)和众所周知的高效视频编码(HEVC)标准进行了主观比较和客观测量。选取多个不同内容的视频作为测试序列。高清晰度(HD)和超高清晰度(UHD)分辨率在本实验中使用。从低比特率到高比特率的广泛范围被选择。这些序列采用HEVC参考软件(HM-16.2)和VVC最新参考软件(VTM-5.0)进行编码。获得的结果表明,对于真实的比特率和质量水平,VVC始终优于HEVC,在主观尺度的40%范围内。在客观测量方面,以PSNR、SSIM和VMAF作为质量指标,根据视频内容和空间分辨率的不同,VVC比HEVC的质量增强幅度在31%到40%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient Delivery of Very High Dynamic Range Compressed Imagery by Dynamic-Range-of-Interest Novel Coding Tools Based on Characteristics for Short Videos Extending Video Decoding Energy Models for 360° and HDR Video Formats in HEVC Generalized binary splits: A versatile partitioning scheme for block-based hybrid video coding An IBP-CNN Based Fast Block Partition For Intra Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1