Technology Improvement and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) on Regional Development in Special Region of Yogyakarta

Rian Marita Sugiarto, D. Iskandar
{"title":"Technology Improvement and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) on Regional Development in Special Region of Yogyakarta","authors":"Rian Marita Sugiarto, D. Iskandar","doi":"10.12928/optimum.v13i1.3829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new perspective on regional economic development is development capital generated from the region. MSMEs and Higher Education as development capital of the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) have different characteristics. Development is recognized as a process in which interrelationships and effects between the variables lead to regional development. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the effect of regional development capital on regional development. This study aims to examine the use of PLS-SEM in designing a model of the relationship between technological innovation, capital, and workforce on regional development. This current study also aims to observe the effect of latent predictor variables (Xi) of technology, innovation, capital, and workforce on LPE, HDI, and poverty rate as the latent dependent variable of regional development (Yi). Regional development capital has a positive effect on LPE. Technology has a positive and significant effect on innovation by 92.6%. Innovation Technology positively affects Economic Growth by 14.44% but is not significant. Though it is not significant, regional capital proxied by MSMEs positively affects economic growth. The workforce has a negative and insignificant effect on the economic growth of -28.3%. LPE and HDI have a negative effect on the poverty rate, although not significant at -6.8% and -13.3%, respectively. LPE and HDI play a role in reducing poverty. However, they perform on different paths. Workforce productivity is still low. Thus, it has not been able to boost economic growth and reduce poverty. These results are expected to be utilized as a basis for developing strategies for technology utilization by MSMEs","PeriodicalId":282022,"journal":{"name":"Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v13i1.3829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A new perspective on regional economic development is development capital generated from the region. MSMEs and Higher Education as development capital of the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) have different characteristics. Development is recognized as a process in which interrelationships and effects between the variables lead to regional development. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the effect of regional development capital on regional development. This study aims to examine the use of PLS-SEM in designing a model of the relationship between technological innovation, capital, and workforce on regional development. This current study also aims to observe the effect of latent predictor variables (Xi) of technology, innovation, capital, and workforce on LPE, HDI, and poverty rate as the latent dependent variable of regional development (Yi). Regional development capital has a positive effect on LPE. Technology has a positive and significant effect on innovation by 92.6%. Innovation Technology positively affects Economic Growth by 14.44% but is not significant. Though it is not significant, regional capital proxied by MSMEs positively affects economic growth. The workforce has a negative and insignificant effect on the economic growth of -28.3%. LPE and HDI have a negative effect on the poverty rate, although not significant at -6.8% and -13.3%, respectively. LPE and HDI play a role in reducing poverty. However, they perform on different paths. Workforce productivity is still low. Thus, it has not been able to boost economic growth and reduce poverty. These results are expected to be utilized as a basis for developing strategies for technology utilization by MSMEs
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日惹特区的技术改进和中小微企业(MSMEs)的区域发展
区域经济发展的新视角是区域产生的发展资本。中小微企业与高等教育作为日惹特区的发展资本有着不同的特点。发展被认为是一个过程,在这个过程中,各种变量之间的相互关系和影响导致区域发展。因此,有必要明确区域发展资本对区域发展的影响。本研究旨在检验PLS-SEM在设计技术创新、资本和劳动力对区域发展的关系模型中的应用。区域发展资本对LPE有正向影响。技术对创新有显著的正向影响(92.6%)。创新技术对经济增长的正向影响为14.44%,但不显著。中小微企业所代理的区域资本对经济增长具有正向影响,但影响并不显著。劳动力对经济增长(-28.3%)的影响为负且不显著。LPE和HDI对贫困率有负面影响,尽管不显著,分别为-6.8%和-13.3%。LPE和HDI在减少贫困方面发挥作用。然而,它们在不同的路径上执行。劳动力生产率仍然很低。因此,它未能促进经济增长和减少贫困。预期这些结果将被用来作为制定中小微企业利用技术战略的基础
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESG and firm performance: The moderating role of gender diversity Relative risk of COVID-19 pandemic and regional inflation convergence in Indonesia: Spatial panel data approach Analysis of village-owned enterprises (BUMDes) welfare: Social capital as moderation Analysis of exchange rates in the economic uncertainty era Manufacturing sectors and environmental sustainability: The impact and policy mitigation in Sumatra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1