Teaching Cognitive and Metacognitive SRL Strategies in the Science Class: An Experimental Design to Determine Effect on Academic Achievement

Medina-Martínez Marilyn, Pagán-Maldonado Nellie
{"title":"Teaching Cognitive and Metacognitive SRL Strategies in the Science Class: An Experimental Design to Determine Effect on Academic Achievement","authors":"Medina-Martínez Marilyn, Pagán-Maldonado Nellie","doi":"10.18562/IJEE.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of teaching cognitive and metacognitive SRL strategies on the academic achievement of seventh grade students through an experimental design with a pre and posttest and a comparison group. The Reciprocal Causation Model based on Bandura’s social cognitive theory and Zimmerman ́s Model of Self-Regulation were used as the theoretical framework. The intervention provided to the experimental group (Group A; n=15) consisted of the direct and explicit instruction of cognitive and metacognitive SRL strategies. The intervention in the comparison group (Group B; n=15) consisted of self-directed learning. The effect of the intervention was determined by running a t-test to compare pre and posttest results. A significance level of .05 was established for each of the four hypotheses. The results from the t-test (.032) from the posttest of the experimental group and the comparison group show that the differences found were statistically significant. Moreover, a Cohen’s d coefficient of 0.82 was obtained, which represents a large effect size. This finding suggests that the direct and explicit instruction of cognitive and metacognitive SRL strategies has a greater effect on the academic achievement than self-directed instruction. Contrarily, the results from the t-test (.112) that compared the sample means () obtained from the pre and posttest of the experimental group (Group A) indicated that the differences found were not statistically significant. However, a Cohen’s d coefficient of 0.58 was obtained, representing a moderate effect size. This finding could suggest that the complexity of the design requires additional controls to be put into place. With regards to the comparison group (Group B), and according to student responses in the SRL strategy a Departamento de Educación, Distrito Escolar de Las Marías (Puerto Rico United States); b Universidad Metropolitana, SUAGM (Puerto Rico United States). Correspondence: Marilyn Medina Martínez, Coordinadora Regional PPAA de Mayagüez, Supervisora de Inglés, Departamento de Educación, Distrito de Las Marías, #5 Calle Palmer Suite 1. Las Marias, PR 00670. mmedina97@email.suagm.edu Medina-Martínez and Pagán-Maldonado, International Journal of Educational Excellence, (2016) Vol. 2, No. 1, 77-105. ISSN 2373-5929 DOI: 10.18562/IJEE.020 use logs, it was evidenced that these strategies were used infrequently. Recommendations for future investigations are provided. Key-Words: Self-Regulation, Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), Cognitive Strategies, Metacognitive Strategies, Direct and Explicit Instruction, Self-Directed Learning. ______________________________________________________________________","PeriodicalId":243145,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Excellence","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Excellence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18562/IJEE.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of teaching cognitive and metacognitive SRL strategies on the academic achievement of seventh grade students through an experimental design with a pre and posttest and a comparison group. The Reciprocal Causation Model based on Bandura’s social cognitive theory and Zimmerman ́s Model of Self-Regulation were used as the theoretical framework. The intervention provided to the experimental group (Group A; n=15) consisted of the direct and explicit instruction of cognitive and metacognitive SRL strategies. The intervention in the comparison group (Group B; n=15) consisted of self-directed learning. The effect of the intervention was determined by running a t-test to compare pre and posttest results. A significance level of .05 was established for each of the four hypotheses. The results from the t-test (.032) from the posttest of the experimental group and the comparison group show that the differences found were statistically significant. Moreover, a Cohen’s d coefficient of 0.82 was obtained, which represents a large effect size. This finding suggests that the direct and explicit instruction of cognitive and metacognitive SRL strategies has a greater effect on the academic achievement than self-directed instruction. Contrarily, the results from the t-test (.112) that compared the sample means () obtained from the pre and posttest of the experimental group (Group A) indicated that the differences found were not statistically significant. However, a Cohen’s d coefficient of 0.58 was obtained, representing a moderate effect size. This finding could suggest that the complexity of the design requires additional controls to be put into place. With regards to the comparison group (Group B), and according to student responses in the SRL strategy a Departamento de Educación, Distrito Escolar de Las Marías (Puerto Rico United States); b Universidad Metropolitana, SUAGM (Puerto Rico United States). Correspondence: Marilyn Medina Martínez, Coordinadora Regional PPAA de Mayagüez, Supervisora de Inglés, Departamento de Educación, Distrito de Las Marías, #5 Calle Palmer Suite 1. Las Marias, PR 00670. mmedina97@email.suagm.edu Medina-Martínez and Pagán-Maldonado, International Journal of Educational Excellence, (2016) Vol. 2, No. 1, 77-105. ISSN 2373-5929 DOI: 10.18562/IJEE.020 use logs, it was evidenced that these strategies were used infrequently. Recommendations for future investigations are provided. Key-Words: Self-Regulation, Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), Cognitive Strategies, Metacognitive Strategies, Direct and Explicit Instruction, Self-Directed Learning. ______________________________________________________________________
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学课教学中认知与元认知SRL策略:对学业成绩影响的实验设计
摘要本研究采用前测、后测和对照组的实验设计,探讨教学认知策略和元认知策略对七年级学生学业成绩的影响。以班杜拉的社会认知理论为基础的因果关系模型和齐默尔曼的自我调节模型为理论框架。实验组(A组;n=15)包括认知和元认知SRL策略的直接和外显指导。对照组(B组;N =15)由自主学习组成。干预的效果是通过t检验来比较前后测试结果来确定的。四个假设的显著性水平均为0.05。实验组和对照组的后验t检验(.032)结果显示,发现的差异具有统计学意义。Cohen’s d系数为0.82,表明效应量较大。这一发现表明,认知策略和元认知策略的直接和外显指导对学业成绩的影响大于自我指导。与此相反,实验组(A组)前后检验的样本均值()的t检验结果(.112)显示差异无统计学意义。然而,科恩的d系数为0.58,表示中等效应大小。这一发现表明,设计的复杂性需要额外的控制措施。关于比较组(B组),根据学生在SRL战略中对部门Educación的反应,Las Escolar区Marías(美国波多黎各);b大都会大学(美国波多黎各)。通信:Marilyn Medina Martínez,协调员区域PPAA de mayagez,主管de ingl,部门Educación,区Las Marías, #5 Calle Palmer Suite 1。Las Marias, PR 00670。mmedina97@email.suagm.edu Medina-Martínez and Pagán-Maldonado,《国际教育学报》(2016)第2卷第1期,77-105。Issn 2373-5929 doi: 10.18562/ ijee。在使用日志时,可以证明这些策略很少被使用。对今后的调查提出了建议。关键词:自我调节,自我调节学习,认知策略,元认知策略,直接与外显教学,自主学习______________________________________________________________________
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fractal kinetics of COVID-19 pandemic Artificial Intelligence Forecasting of Covid-19 in China Visual Data Analysis and Simulation Prediction for COVID-19 Professional Practice in Higher Education: A Case Study in Faculty Training and Development in Brazil A New Theoretical Construct in the Concept of Self-Regulated Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1