Love from the Point of View of the Universe

M. Nussbaum
{"title":"Love from the Point of View of the Universe","authors":"M. Nussbaum","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190873455.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A surprising connection was recently discovered between the proper Victorian philosopher Henry Sidgwick, great Utilitarian theorist, and Walt Whitman. I explore the deep affinity between Utilitarianism, often mischaracterized as cold, obtuse, and economistic, and Whitman’s radical poetic humanism. The Utilitarian vision of the founders also sought a radical equality, aiming to increase the average utility of each individual, regardless of social status. Like Whitman’s poetry, its vision of human desire resisted the hypocritical hierarchies of conventional morality. Jeremy Bentham, Utilitarianism’s founder, criticized conventional morality by arguing that pleasures differed only in quantity rather than quality. He rejected the distinction between “higher” and “lower” pleasures as a screen behind which to condemn the behavior of others while validating one’s own desires. Yet where Utilitarian critique may seem obtuse or fail to provide a positive vision for human endeavor, it benefits from Whitman’s poetic vision of cosmic unity and democratic equality. Whitman’s poetry could recognize qualitative differences in political values without a return to hierarchy. Considering the affinity between these figures and their ideas may lead us to an economics informed by both utilitarian critical reason and a passionate, qualitative assessment of political values.","PeriodicalId":387376,"journal":{"name":"Power, Prose, and Purse","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power, Prose, and Purse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190873455.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A surprising connection was recently discovered between the proper Victorian philosopher Henry Sidgwick, great Utilitarian theorist, and Walt Whitman. I explore the deep affinity between Utilitarianism, often mischaracterized as cold, obtuse, and economistic, and Whitman’s radical poetic humanism. The Utilitarian vision of the founders also sought a radical equality, aiming to increase the average utility of each individual, regardless of social status. Like Whitman’s poetry, its vision of human desire resisted the hypocritical hierarchies of conventional morality. Jeremy Bentham, Utilitarianism’s founder, criticized conventional morality by arguing that pleasures differed only in quantity rather than quality. He rejected the distinction between “higher” and “lower” pleasures as a screen behind which to condemn the behavior of others while validating one’s own desires. Yet where Utilitarian critique may seem obtuse or fail to provide a positive vision for human endeavor, it benefits from Whitman’s poetic vision of cosmic unity and democratic equality. Whitman’s poetry could recognize qualitative differences in political values without a return to hierarchy. Considering the affinity between these figures and their ideas may lead us to an economics informed by both utilitarian critical reason and a passionate, qualitative assessment of political values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从宇宙的角度看爱
最近,人们在维多利亚时代的哲学家、伟大的功利主义理论家亨利·西季威克和沃尔特·惠特曼之间发现了一种令人惊讶的联系。我探索了功利主义与惠特曼激进的诗意人文主义之间的深刻联系,功利主义经常被误解为冷酷、迟钝和经济主义。开国元勋的功利主义愿景也寻求一种彻底的平等,旨在提高每个人的平均效用,而不管社会地位如何。就像惠特曼的诗歌一样,它对人类欲望的看法抵制了传统道德的虚伪等级制度。功利主义的创始人杰里米·边沁(Jeremy Bentham)批评传统道德,认为快乐只在数量上不同,而在质量上不同。他拒绝将“更高”和“更低”的快乐区分为谴责他人的行为,同时认可自己的欲望的屏障。然而,在功利主义批判似乎迟钝或未能为人类努力提供积极愿景的地方,它受益于惠特曼对宇宙统一和民主平等的诗意愿景。惠特曼的诗歌可以在不回归等级制度的情况下认识到政治价值观的质的差异。考虑到这些人物和他们的思想之间的密切关系,可能会把我们引向一种由功利主义批判理性和对政治价值的热情、定性评估共同构成的经济学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wealth and Warfare in the Novels of Jane Austen The Second New Deal and the Fourth Courtroom Wall Commerce, Law, and Revolution in the Novels of Elizabeth Gaskell and Charlotte Brontë Regulating Greed Money and Art in Edward Bellamy’s Looking Backward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1