Yuri Castro , Andrés Chale-Yaringaño , Ulises Palomino-Gonzales , Norma Ojeda-Quispe , Lesly Chavez-Rimache , Gabriela Tejada-Bazan , Dilmer Quincho Rosales , Kelly Aguilar-Bautista , Felipe Rios-Wong-Borges , Manuel Rojas-Arca , Carolina Montellano , James Collins , Sixto Grados-Pomarino
{"title":"Producción científica en periodoncia e implantes a nivel de Iberoamérica","authors":"Yuri Castro , Andrés Chale-Yaringaño , Ulises Palomino-Gonzales , Norma Ojeda-Quispe , Lesly Chavez-Rimache , Gabriela Tejada-Bazan , Dilmer Quincho Rosales , Kelly Aguilar-Bautista , Felipe Rios-Wong-Borges , Manuel Rojas-Arca , Carolina Montellano , James Collins , Sixto Grados-Pomarino","doi":"10.1016/j.piro.2016.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To analyse the scientific production in therapeutic implants and periodontology in Latin American journals.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A literature review that analysed scientific articles published in dental journals in the countries of the Ibero-Pan-American Federation of Periodontology during the years 2012-2014. The search for articles was made through a manual analysis via the web portal in each journal and through SciELO, RedALyC, and LiLACS data bases. The scientific productivity was determined by year, type, design, and level of evidence for each article, as well as the subject of Periodontology and/or dental implants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis was performed on 505 articles over a period of 3 years, and most of them were published in three countries: 47.7% from Brazil, 14.7% in Mexico, and 8.1% in Chile. Of these, 23.9% were review articles and 43.76% had an evidence level of <span>iv</span>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The highest productivity of publications is concentrated in journals from Brazil, Mexico, Chile, and Spain. The main theme of scientific publications referred to dental implants. The quality of publications at Latin American level is low, with a predominance of case reports and review articles (level <span>iv</span>), and less systematic reviews and clinical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21203,"journal":{"name":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 114-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piro.2016.03.005","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0718539116000240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Aim
To analyse the scientific production in therapeutic implants and periodontology in Latin American journals.
Materials and methods
A literature review that analysed scientific articles published in dental journals in the countries of the Ibero-Pan-American Federation of Periodontology during the years 2012-2014. The search for articles was made through a manual analysis via the web portal in each journal and through SciELO, RedALyC, and LiLACS data bases. The scientific productivity was determined by year, type, design, and level of evidence for each article, as well as the subject of Periodontology and/or dental implants.
Results
The analysis was performed on 505 articles over a period of 3 years, and most of them were published in three countries: 47.7% from Brazil, 14.7% in Mexico, and 8.1% in Chile. Of these, 23.9% were review articles and 43.76% had an evidence level of iv.
Conclusion
The highest productivity of publications is concentrated in journals from Brazil, Mexico, Chile, and Spain. The main theme of scientific publications referred to dental implants. The quality of publications at Latin American level is low, with a predominance of case reports and review articles (level iv), and less systematic reviews and clinical trials.