Exploring the Development of a Framework for Informal E-mentoring of Online Health Education Students: A Formative Evaluation [Research in Progress]

Sherry Tarver-Grover
{"title":"Exploring the Development of a Framework for Informal E-mentoring of Online Health Education Students: A Formative Evaluation [Research in Progress]","authors":"Sherry Tarver-Grover","doi":"10.28945/4156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this pilot case study is to provide details on developing a framework for e-mentoring graduate level online health education students as an added component of an online health education course. \n\nBackground: E-mentoring gives faculty the opportunity to share professional knowledge with students and impart practical experiences. In addition, faculty can show how the course content is teaching skills applicable to student’s personal and professional goals. There is an abundance of research and professional literature that includes mentoring of graduate students, but this literature base has not shown a development in a theory and models used in e-mentoring. As yet, however, literature dealing with e-mentoring the future health educator is scarce or nonexistent even though technology such as mobile apps, email, listservs, chat groups and conferencing could enhance the e-mentoring process.\n\nMethodology: The framework is described in the context of a curriculum development and a program planning model. Following the steps designed in this framework, mentees are guided through a course that begins with setting goals and ends with an evaluation process. The steps are similar to what health educator’s use in the program planning process, which is also a component of building a community program. The model uses both psychosocial variables that help build identity and coaching functions as a guide and to obtain measurements.\n\nContribution: The study ends with a mix of evaluations that include the formative and sum-mative evaluations. A formative evaluation is conducted throughout the pro-cess. A summative evaluation will be conducted at the end to gain feedback. For the summative evaluation, constructs from the mentoring scale will be used.\n\nFindings: This case study was prepared to serve as a basis for discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective e-mentoring process for health educators.","PeriodicalId":249265,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 InSITE Conference","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 InSITE Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this pilot case study is to provide details on developing a framework for e-mentoring graduate level online health education students as an added component of an online health education course. Background: E-mentoring gives faculty the opportunity to share professional knowledge with students and impart practical experiences. In addition, faculty can show how the course content is teaching skills applicable to student’s personal and professional goals. There is an abundance of research and professional literature that includes mentoring of graduate students, but this literature base has not shown a development in a theory and models used in e-mentoring. As yet, however, literature dealing with e-mentoring the future health educator is scarce or nonexistent even though technology such as mobile apps, email, listservs, chat groups and conferencing could enhance the e-mentoring process. Methodology: The framework is described in the context of a curriculum development and a program planning model. Following the steps designed in this framework, mentees are guided through a course that begins with setting goals and ends with an evaluation process. The steps are similar to what health educator’s use in the program planning process, which is also a component of building a community program. The model uses both psychosocial variables that help build identity and coaching functions as a guide and to obtain measurements. Contribution: The study ends with a mix of evaluations that include the formative and sum-mative evaluations. A formative evaluation is conducted throughout the pro-cess. A summative evaluation will be conducted at the end to gain feedback. For the summative evaluation, constructs from the mentoring scale will be used. Findings: This case study was prepared to serve as a basis for discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective e-mentoring process for health educators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络健康教育学生非正式电子辅导框架的构建:形成性评价[研究进展]
目的/目的:这一试点案例研究的目的是详细说明如何制定一个框架,为研究生级在线健康教育学生提供电子指导,作为在线健康教育课程的一个额外组成部分。背景:电子辅导为教师提供了与学生分享专业知识和传授实践经验的机会。此外,教师可以展示课程内容如何教授适用于学生个人和职业目标的技能。虽然有大量的研究和专业文献涉及到研究生辅导,但这一文献基础并没有显示出电子辅导理论和模型的发展。然而,到目前为止,尽管移动应用程序、电子邮件、listservs、聊天组和会议等技术可以增强电子指导过程,但关于电子指导未来健康教育者的文献很少或根本不存在。方法论:该框架是在课程开发和项目规划模型的背景下描述的。按照这个框架中设计的步骤,学员将被引导完成一个课程,从设定目标开始,到评估过程结束。这些步骤类似于健康教育者在项目规划过程中使用的步骤,这也是建立社区项目的一个组成部分。该模型使用有助于建立身份和指导功能的社会心理变量作为指导并获得测量值。贡献:本研究以包括形成性评估和总结性评估的混合评估结束。在整个过程中进行形成性评估。最后进行总结性评价,获得反馈。对于总结性评估,将使用师徒量表中的构念。研究结果:本案例研究的目的是作为讨论的基础,而不是说明对健康教育工作者有效或无效的电子指导过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Contribution in Aid of Construction on Utility Dilapidated Infrastructure: Evidence from the State of Florida [Abstract] Emoji Identification and Prediction in Hebrew Political Corpus Transforming a First-year Accounting Course Using a Blended Learning Pathway Educational Technology in IT and Marketing Education - The Experience of Early Thai Educators [Abstract] Workshop: Keyword Discovery: Visualizing Your Topic in Research, Thesis and Dissertation Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1