Distracting Attentional Focus from Fatigues Does Task Complexity Make a Difference

W. Rejeski, Elizabeth Kenney
{"title":"Distracting Attentional Focus from Fatigues Does Task Complexity Make a Difference","authors":"W. Rejeski, Elizabeth Kenney","doi":"10.1123/JSP.9.1.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined how exercise endurance was influenced by varying the task complexity of dissociative coping. In Trial 1, 60 subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: a simple cognitive task (SCT), a complex cognitive task (CCT), or a control group (CG). All subjects were instructed to maintain an isometric contraction of 40% maximum on a handgrip dynamometer for as long as possible. Results revealed that subjects in the SCT and CCT conditions had greater endurance than those in the CG; however, varying the complexity of the task made no difference. Trial 2, a within-subjects design, was implemented to examine the potential mediating effects of task preference on cognitive coping. The protocol was identical to Trial 1 except that subjects previously assigned to the SCT condition were given the CCT and vice versa. Upon completion of Trial 2, subjects were asked which coping style they had preferred. A two-way mixed ANO-VA resulted in a significant coping style X preference interaction ...","PeriodicalId":442839,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sport Psychology","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sport Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/JSP.9.1.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

This study examined how exercise endurance was influenced by varying the task complexity of dissociative coping. In Trial 1, 60 subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: a simple cognitive task (SCT), a complex cognitive task (CCT), or a control group (CG). All subjects were instructed to maintain an isometric contraction of 40% maximum on a handgrip dynamometer for as long as possible. Results revealed that subjects in the SCT and CCT conditions had greater endurance than those in the CG; however, varying the complexity of the task made no difference. Trial 2, a within-subjects design, was implemented to examine the potential mediating effects of task preference on cognitive coping. The protocol was identical to Trial 1 except that subjects previously assigned to the SCT condition were given the CCT and vice versa. Upon completion of Trial 2, subjects were asked which coping style they had preferred. A two-way mixed ANO-VA resulted in a significant coping style X preference interaction ...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从疲劳中分散注意力,任务的复杂性会产生影响
本研究考察了不同解离性应对任务复杂性对运动耐力的影响。在试验1中,60名受试者被随机分配到三个条件之一:简单认知任务(SCT),复杂认知任务(CCT)或对照组(CG)。所有受试者都被要求尽可能长时间地在握力计上保持最大40%的等距收缩。结果显示,SCT和CCT组受试者的耐力高于CG组;然而,改变任务的复杂程度并没有什么不同。试验二采用被试内部设计,考察任务偏好对认知应对的潜在中介作用。该方案与试验1相同,只是先前分配到SCT条件的受试者被给予CCT,反之亦然。试验2完成后,受试者被问及他们更喜欢哪种应对方式。双向混合ANO-VA导致了显著的应对方式-偏好交互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Visual Occlusion Training and Visual Allowance Training on Perceptual Distance and Actual Performance Distance of Golf Putting Conceptualizing the Construct of Athletic Identity in Korean Elite Athletes The Effects of the ACT-based Career Group Counseling Program for Retired Athletes in Their Teens A Study on Self-controlled Learning in Practice Conditions of Faded and Increased Feedback The Effect of Contextual Interference in Attentional Focus on Learning of Badminton High-Clear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1