Addressing Adequacy Concerns with Contracts: Review of Past, Present and Possible Future

Jonas K. Sekamane
{"title":"Addressing Adequacy Concerns with Contracts: Review of Past, Present and Possible Future","authors":"Jonas K. Sekamane","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2018.8469970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several papers propose using call options (i.e. a contract to sell energy at a pre-determined price in the future) as a mechanism to insure new investments and adequate capacity in electricity markets. Other papers have since extended on this idea. However, it is cumbersome for newcomers to get an overview of these capacity remuneration mechanism efforts, chiefly because the papers use different names (“reliability options”, “option contracts” and “forward reliability markets” to name a few) for what is the same mechanism in its basic form. This paper provides a review of these papers, presents an intuitive introduction to the basic underlying mechanism, and highlights the differences between the various approaches. In addition, this paper points out where the future research of this topic might be heading.","PeriodicalId":334674,"journal":{"name":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2018.8469970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several papers propose using call options (i.e. a contract to sell energy at a pre-determined price in the future) as a mechanism to insure new investments and adequate capacity in electricity markets. Other papers have since extended on this idea. However, it is cumbersome for newcomers to get an overview of these capacity remuneration mechanism efforts, chiefly because the papers use different names (“reliability options”, “option contracts” and “forward reliability markets” to name a few) for what is the same mechanism in its basic form. This paper provides a review of these papers, presents an intuitive introduction to the basic underlying mechanism, and highlights the differences between the various approaches. In addition, this paper points out where the future research of this topic might be heading.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决合同的充分性问题:回顾过去、现在和可能的未来
一些论文建议使用看涨期权(即未来以预先确定的价格出售能源的合同)作为一种机制,以确保电力市场上的新投资和足够的容量。此后,其他论文对这一观点进行了扩展。然而,对于新手来说,对这些能力薪酬机制的努力进行概述是很麻烦的,主要是因为这些论文使用了不同的名称(“可靠性期权”、“期权合同”和“远期可靠性市场”等等)来描述基本形式相同的机制。本文对这些论文进行了回顾,直观地介绍了基本的潜在机制,并强调了各种方法之间的差异。此外,本文还指出了本课题未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fast Frequency Control Services in Europe Development of the Polish Power Exchange as a Management System in Terms of Control Theory and Systems Engineering Are Consumption Tariffs Still Up-to-Date? an Operationalized Assessment of Grid Fees Enhancing N -1 Security via Building Thermostatic Load Control Strategy Improvement of DC Microgrid Voltage Regulation Based on Bidirectional Intelligent Charging Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1