Trust Assessment for Web Services Collaboration

H. Yahyaoui
{"title":"Trust Assessment for Web Services Collaboration","authors":"H. Yahyaoui","doi":"10.1109/ICWS.2010.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present in this paper a trust-based game theoretical model for Web services collaboration. The devised model is an application of the generic model about tasks allocation for agents, which is presented in [13]. We consider that a collaboration between Web services captures a possible interaction for achieving a specific task. We consider such collaboration as a game in which several Web services compete to win a task by bidding a cost for achieving it. The game winner is the Web service which has the minimal trust-based cost, which is the product of the cost and the inverse of the trust value of the bidding Web service. Initial trust values are computed based on the distance between the actual and the announced quality attribute values of a Web service. These values are computed during a collaboration evaluation period. They are updated after each game round based on a bayesian model. We show in this paper how the use of trust allows a safer collaboration between Web services with respect to collaborations where there is no consideration of the trust as a criteria for allocating tasks.","PeriodicalId":170573,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2010.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

We present in this paper a trust-based game theoretical model for Web services collaboration. The devised model is an application of the generic model about tasks allocation for agents, which is presented in [13]. We consider that a collaboration between Web services captures a possible interaction for achieving a specific task. We consider such collaboration as a game in which several Web services compete to win a task by bidding a cost for achieving it. The game winner is the Web service which has the minimal trust-based cost, which is the product of the cost and the inverse of the trust value of the bidding Web service. Initial trust values are computed based on the distance between the actual and the announced quality attribute values of a Web service. These values are computed during a collaboration evaluation period. They are updated after each game round based on a bayesian model. We show in this paper how the use of trust allows a safer collaboration between Web services with respect to collaborations where there is no consideration of the trust as a criteria for allocating tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Web服务协作的信任评估
本文提出了一个基于信任的Web服务协作博弈理论模型。所设计的模型是[13]中关于智能体任务分配的通用模型的应用。我们认为Web服务之间的协作捕获了实现特定任务的可能交互。我们将这种协作视为一种游戏,其中几个Web服务通过竞标完成任务的成本来竞争。博弈的赢家是具有最小基于信任的成本的Web服务,该成本是成本与投标Web服务的信任值的倒数的乘积。初始信任值是根据Web服务的实际质量属性值和宣布的质量属性值之间的距离计算的。这些值是在协作评估期间计算的。它们会在每一轮游戏后根据贝叶斯模型进行更新。在本文中,我们展示了在不考虑将信任作为分配任务的标准的情况下,使用信任如何允许Web服务之间更安全的协作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Everett: Providing Branch-Isolation for a Data Evolution Service Message Correlation and Web Service Protocol Mining from Inaccurate Logs QoS Aware Semantic Web Service Composition Approach Considering Pre/Postconditions Benchmarking Vulnerability Detection Tools for Web Services Service Selection Based on Customer Rating of Quality of Service Attributes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1