Balancing Safety Against Obstruction to Health Care Access: An Examination of Behavioral Flags in the VA Health Care System

L. Weinberger, S. Sreenivasan, Daniel E. Smee, J. McGuire, T. Garrick
{"title":"Balancing Safety Against Obstruction to Health Care Access: An Examination of Behavioral Flags in the VA Health Care System","authors":"L. Weinberger, S. Sreenivasan, Daniel E. Smee, J. McGuire, T. Garrick","doi":"10.1037/tam0000096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2003, the Veterans Affairs (VA) instituted an alert, known as behavioral flags, in the veteran’s nationwide electronic medical record. The flag can be placed for those who demonstrate physical or verbal aggression, and functions as a “warning” to staff that the patient poses an increased risk of harm to others. The flag also gives directives regarding actions to be taken before seeing the veteran (such as, VA police presence, restricting appointments to areas with metal detectors, restricting care to specific clinics or medical centers). Critics have alleged that behavioral flags are a method to punish those who complain about their health care by imposing restrictions at VA facilities. Indeed, data suggest that the overwhelming majority of “flagged” VA patient behaviors have been verbal. Behavioral flags may discourage veterans from seeking needed VA care, particularly, when restrictions such as VA police escorts to clinic appointments may be perceived as humiliating. Given this, alternatives to flag placement would be a comprehensive violence risk assessment and interventions that enhance a veteran’s control over disruptive behavior.","PeriodicalId":217565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In 2003, the Veterans Affairs (VA) instituted an alert, known as behavioral flags, in the veteran’s nationwide electronic medical record. The flag can be placed for those who demonstrate physical or verbal aggression, and functions as a “warning” to staff that the patient poses an increased risk of harm to others. The flag also gives directives regarding actions to be taken before seeing the veteran (such as, VA police presence, restricting appointments to areas with metal detectors, restricting care to specific clinics or medical centers). Critics have alleged that behavioral flags are a method to punish those who complain about their health care by imposing restrictions at VA facilities. Indeed, data suggest that the overwhelming majority of “flagged” VA patient behaviors have been verbal. Behavioral flags may discourage veterans from seeking needed VA care, particularly, when restrictions such as VA police escorts to clinic appointments may be perceived as humiliating. Given this, alternatives to flag placement would be a comprehensive violence risk assessment and interventions that enhance a veteran’s control over disruptive behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡安全与阻碍卫生保健访问:在VA卫生保健系统的行为标志的检查
2003年,退伍军人事务部(VA)在退伍军人的全国电子医疗记录中设立了一个警报,称为行为标志。这面旗帜可以贴在那些表现出身体或言语攻击的人身上,作为对工作人员的“警告”,提醒他们病人对他人造成伤害的风险正在增加。这面旗帜还指示了在见到退伍军人之前应该采取的行动(例如,退伍军人事务部的警察在场,限制预约到有金属探测器的区域,限制在特定的诊所或医疗中心进行护理)。批评人士称,行为标志是一种惩罚那些抱怨医疗保健的人的方法,通过对退伍军人管理局的设施施加限制。事实上,数据表明,绝大多数“被标记”的退伍军人事务部患者行为都是口头的。行为标志可能会阻止退伍军人寻求必要的退伍军人事务部护理,特别是当退伍军人事务部警察护送他们去诊所预约等限制可能被认为是羞辱的时候。考虑到这一点,替代国旗放置将是一个全面的暴力风险评估和干预措施,以加强退伍军人对破坏性行为的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk and threat assessment instruments for violent extremism: A systematic review. Supplemental Material for Risk and Threat Assessment Instruments for Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review Supplemental Material for Differentiating Between Harmless and Harmful Threats: What Factors Increase Risk of Violence Following Threats? Target dispersion as a preapproach indicator in threat assessment and management. Supplemental Material for Risk Assessment Challenges in a Specialized Clinic for Individuals Referred for Violent Extremism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1