Reproductive Freedom and the Paradigmatic Character of Plato's "Republic"

T. Samaras
{"title":"Reproductive Freedom and the Paradigmatic Character of Plato's \"Republic\"","authors":"T. Samaras","doi":"10.35296/jhs.v4i1.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Republic, the paradigmatic character of Plato’s best city appears incompatible with the use of deception in the procreative practices of the Auxiliaries and Guardians. I argue that this incongruity, as well as the exact provisions of Plato’s reproduction festival, are explained by three facts: his commitment to eugenics, his insistence on the abolition of the typical Greek household and his belief that there are serious limitations to the type of knowledge that Auxiliaries can achieve.","PeriodicalId":246054,"journal":{"name":"Akropolis: Journal of Hellenic Studies","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akropolis: Journal of Hellenic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35296/jhs.v4i1.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the Republic, the paradigmatic character of Plato’s best city appears incompatible with the use of deception in the procreative practices of the Auxiliaries and Guardians. I argue that this incongruity, as well as the exact provisions of Plato’s reproduction festival, are explained by three facts: his commitment to eugenics, his insistence on the abolition of the typical Greek household and his belief that there are serious limitations to the type of knowledge that Auxiliaries can achieve.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生殖自由与柏拉图“理想国”的范式特征
在《理想国》中,柏拉图最好的城市的典范特征,似乎与辅助者和守护者在生育实践中使用欺骗是不相容的。我认为,这种不协调,以及柏拉图的繁殖节的确切规定,可以用三个事实来解释:他对优生学的承诺,他坚持废除典型的希腊家庭,他相信辅助者所能获得的知识类型有严重的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sources for the Study of Early Ecumenical Views of Amfilohije Radović: Justin Popović Metropolitan Amfilohije’s Views on St Gregory Palamas and Orthodoxy: A Return to Palamism Language as a Means of Communication with God Paul's Idea of the "New Man" and Transhumanism Valuing Goods: The Development of Commensurability in Archaic Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1