Vasectomy is family planning: factors affecting uptake among men in eastern province of Rwanda

C. Ntakirutimana, Providence M. Umuziga, Bellancille Nikuze, R. White, P. Meharry, O. Adejumo
{"title":"Vasectomy is family planning: factors affecting uptake among men in eastern province of Rwanda","authors":"C. Ntakirutimana, Providence M. Umuziga, Bellancille Nikuze, R. White, P. Meharry, O. Adejumo","doi":"10.4314/RJMHS.V2I2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vasectomy is the only permanent method of male contraception. It is safer, cheaper, and easier to provide than female sterilisation. Men typically take a vocal role as decision-makers in Africa, yet it is women who take family planning (FP) action. Objective: To assess the knowledge and attitude of men toward vasectomy as a method of FP in the Eastern Province of Rwanda. Methods: A cross-sectional design, and systematic sampling of every other household was used in a selected area. The sample size was 390 men and a valid questionnaire was used to collect data. Data analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Sociodemographic characteristics affecting vasectomy included education (p < 0.001), religion (p < 0.001), and the number of sexual partners (p = 0.018). Knowledge scores ranged from 58.4% to 82.6%. Many participants agreed that men should take part in FP (78.7%), and use vasectomy as an FP method (77.2%). Conclusion: Men scored over 50% on vasectomy knowledge items, though many erroneously believed misconceptions. Misinformation is a barrier to vasectomy uptake, and greater awareness of vasectomy knowledge is needed to change attitudes and increase acceptance. Rwandan families and communities could greatly benefit from men’s active role in family planning. Keywords: Vasectomy, family planning, contraception, men, sub-Sahara Africa","PeriodicalId":315881,"journal":{"name":"Rwanda Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences","volume":"659 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rwanda Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/RJMHS.V2I2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Vasectomy is the only permanent method of male contraception. It is safer, cheaper, and easier to provide than female sterilisation. Men typically take a vocal role as decision-makers in Africa, yet it is women who take family planning (FP) action. Objective: To assess the knowledge and attitude of men toward vasectomy as a method of FP in the Eastern Province of Rwanda. Methods: A cross-sectional design, and systematic sampling of every other household was used in a selected area. The sample size was 390 men and a valid questionnaire was used to collect data. Data analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Sociodemographic characteristics affecting vasectomy included education (p < 0.001), religion (p < 0.001), and the number of sexual partners (p = 0.018). Knowledge scores ranged from 58.4% to 82.6%. Many participants agreed that men should take part in FP (78.7%), and use vasectomy as an FP method (77.2%). Conclusion: Men scored over 50% on vasectomy knowledge items, though many erroneously believed misconceptions. Misinformation is a barrier to vasectomy uptake, and greater awareness of vasectomy knowledge is needed to change attitudes and increase acceptance. Rwandan families and communities could greatly benefit from men’s active role in family planning. Keywords: Vasectomy, family planning, contraception, men, sub-Sahara Africa
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输精管结扎术是计划生育:影响卢旺达东部省男子接受的因素
背景:输精管结扎术是男性唯一永久的避孕方法。它比女性绝育更安全,更便宜,也更容易提供。在非洲,男性通常在决策者中发挥声音作用,而妇女则采取计划生育(FP)行动。目的:了解卢旺达东部省份男性对输精管结扎作为计划生育方法的认知和态度。方法:采用横断面设计,对选定地区的每户家庭进行系统抽样。样本量为390名男性,采用有效问卷收集数据。数据分析包括描述性统计和推断性统计。结果:影响输精管结扎术的社会人口学特征包括教育程度(p < 0.001)、宗教信仰(p < 0.001)和性伴侣数量(p = 0.018)。知识得分从58.4%到82.6%不等。许多参与者同意男性应该参加计划生育(78.7%),并将输精管结扎作为计划生育方法(77.2%)。结论:男性在输精管结扎知识项目上得分超过50%,尽管许多人错误地相信误解。错误信息是接受输精管结扎术的障碍,需要提高对输精管结扎术知识的认识,以改变态度并增加接受度。卢旺达家庭和社区可以大大受益于男子在计划生育方面的积极作用。关键词:输精管结扎,计划生育,避孕,男性,撒哈拉以南非洲
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychology of Abortion: A Qualitative Exploration of Women’s Quality of Life after Termination of Pregnancy Service Provision Exploring Perceptions about Enablers of Women’s Attendance and Adherence to the Recommended Antenatal Care Visits in Rwanda: A Qualitative Study Lived Experiences of Adolescents with HIV in Rwanda: A Phenomenology Study Knowledge about Vitamin D among General Population in Baghdad City Effectiveness of Smartphone Application “Gororokapp” for Type 2 Diabetes Patients’ Self-Management in Rwanda: A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1