A study of burnout and professional fulfilment among respiratory physicians (RP) in United Kingdom (UK)

S. Piracha, A. Raza, Muhammad Bilal Khan Niazi, M. Saleem, M. Ganaie, U. Maqsood
{"title":"A study of burnout and professional fulfilment among respiratory physicians (RP) in United Kingdom (UK)","authors":"S. Piracha, A. Raza, Muhammad Bilal Khan Niazi, M. Saleem, M. Ganaie, U. Maqsood","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: General Medical Council survey (GMC, National Training Surveys 2018: Initial findings report) states that a quarter of medical trainees and over a fifth of trainers have reported burnout due to various reasons. Respiratory medicine is one of the more intense specialties in terms of workload and patient acuity. Aim: We aimed to study professional fulfilment (PF) and burnout among UK RP. Methods: 16-question survey, PF Index (PFI) as a validated tool (Trokel M, Bohman B et al. Academic Psychiatry 2018;42(1):11-24), was designed using Google Forms and sent to 14 deaneries across UK. Data was collected on RPs’ job role, age group, gender, job plan (i.e. general medicine (GIM) on-call commitment) and opinion on the leading causes of burnout. Results: 110 RP completed the survey. 43 (76.8%) consultants and 44 (91.7%) trainee registrars (TR) lacked professional fulfillment. 27 (48.2%) consultants and 26 (54.2%) TR were found to have burnout. All non-training registrars (n=6) were deficient of PF and had burnout. Participants rated Rota Gaps as the leading cause for burnout, while GIM on-call commitment and lack of respect from administrators were voted 2nd and 3rd respectively. Conclusion: Prevalence of burnout and scarcity of PF is much more profound among RP when comparing with similar studies in general medicine. Interestingly most of this is related to mandatory contribution to GIM on-calls than respiratory medicine and pose a threat to recruitment and retention. Ongoing rota gaps is a grave concern especially in wake of Brexit. We recommend running this survey on a wider forum to get thorough results and to take remedies against the leading causes.","PeriodicalId":243267,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Economics","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: General Medical Council survey (GMC, National Training Surveys 2018: Initial findings report) states that a quarter of medical trainees and over a fifth of trainers have reported burnout due to various reasons. Respiratory medicine is one of the more intense specialties in terms of workload and patient acuity. Aim: We aimed to study professional fulfilment (PF) and burnout among UK RP. Methods: 16-question survey, PF Index (PFI) as a validated tool (Trokel M, Bohman B et al. Academic Psychiatry 2018;42(1):11-24), was designed using Google Forms and sent to 14 deaneries across UK. Data was collected on RPs’ job role, age group, gender, job plan (i.e. general medicine (GIM) on-call commitment) and opinion on the leading causes of burnout. Results: 110 RP completed the survey. 43 (76.8%) consultants and 44 (91.7%) trainee registrars (TR) lacked professional fulfillment. 27 (48.2%) consultants and 26 (54.2%) TR were found to have burnout. All non-training registrars (n=6) were deficient of PF and had burnout. Participants rated Rota Gaps as the leading cause for burnout, while GIM on-call commitment and lack of respect from administrators were voted 2nd and 3rd respectively. Conclusion: Prevalence of burnout and scarcity of PF is much more profound among RP when comparing with similar studies in general medicine. Interestingly most of this is related to mandatory contribution to GIM on-calls than respiratory medicine and pose a threat to recruitment and retention. Ongoing rota gaps is a grave concern especially in wake of Brexit. We recommend running this survey on a wider forum to get thorough results and to take remedies against the leading causes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国呼吸内科医生(RP)职业倦怠与职业成就感的研究
背景:医学委员会调查(GMC, 2018年国家培训调查:初步调查结果报告)指出,四分之一的医学学员和超过五分之一的培训师报告由于各种原因而倦怠。呼吸内科在工作量和患者的敏锐度方面都是比较紧张的专业之一。目的:研究英国RP的职业成就感与职业倦怠的关系。方法:16题调查,PF指数(PFI)作为验证工具(Trokel M, Bohman B等)。学术精神病学2018;42(1):11-24),使用谷歌表格设计,并发送给英国的14所院长。数据收集了注册护士的工作角色、年龄、性别、工作计划(即全科医生随叫随到)以及对职业倦怠主要原因的看法。结果:110名RP完成调查。咨询师43人(76.8%)、见习注册师44人(91.7%)缺乏专业成就感。咨询师27名(48.2%)、临床医生26名(54.2%)存在职业倦怠。所有非培训登记员(n=6)均缺乏PF并有倦怠。参与者认为,轮班缺位是导致职业倦怠的主要原因,而GIM随叫随到和缺乏管理人员的尊重分别被选为第二和第三位。结论:与普通医学的类似研究相比,RP中职业倦怠的患病率和PF的稀缺性更为深刻。有趣的是,其中大多数与强制向全球医疗管理提供随叫随到的费用有关,而不是与呼吸内科有关,并对征聘和留用构成威胁。持续的轮值空缺是一个严重的问题,尤其是在英国脱欧之后。我们建议在更广泛的论坛上进行这项调查,以获得彻底的结果,并针对主要原因采取补救措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness of single-inhaler triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment by baseline blood eosinophil count: IMPACT trial Late Breaking Abstract - Variable costs of sepsis in a Greek ICU Analysis of intubate / do not intubate orders in COVID-19 patients Cost Effectiveness Comparison of a Dry Powder Inhaler to a Metered Dose Inhaler plus Valved Holding Chamber based on a Functional Respiratory Imaging (FRI) Model Living with a tracheostomy in MND: A qualitative review of patient and carer perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1