Interrogation of a Bubble in the Indian Market

Ganapathy G Gangadharan, S. N.
{"title":"Interrogation of a Bubble in the Indian Market","authors":"Ganapathy G Gangadharan, S. N.","doi":"10.34218/JOM.6.3.2019.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging markets such as India provide the investors with returns far greater than those in developed markets; taking the average returns from the period 1995 to 2014 the returns are 4.714% to 3.276% of the developed market (US not included). Majority of emerging markets commenced joining with the capital market of the world, thus allowing huge inflow of capital which in turn paved the path for economic growth. Even though the emerging markets provide high returns these may also be an indication of a bubble formation. Detection of a bubble is a tedious task primarily due to the fundamental value of the security being uncertain, the randomness of the fundamentals of the market make detecting bubbles an arduous task. Ratios that foretold the financial crisis of 2007- Market Capitalization to GDP (Buffet Indicator), Price to Earnings Ratio (PE Ratio), Price to Book Value (PB Ratio), Tobin’s Q. Data is collected from the 1999-2000 from various Indian indices such as NIFTY 50, NIFTY NEXT 50, NIFTY BANK, NIFTY 500 S&P BSE SENSEX, S&P BSE 100. The paper utilizes the ratios mentioned above to detect and back track various bubble episodes in the Indian market; methodology used is the Philips et al (2015) right tailed unit test. The paper is also inclined to take steps to mitigate the effects of bubble by amending the financial policies and the monetary liquidity of the financial system.","PeriodicalId":341058,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34218/JOM.6.3.2019.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emerging markets such as India provide the investors with returns far greater than those in developed markets; taking the average returns from the period 1995 to 2014 the returns are 4.714% to 3.276% of the developed market (US not included). Majority of emerging markets commenced joining with the capital market of the world, thus allowing huge inflow of capital which in turn paved the path for economic growth. Even though the emerging markets provide high returns these may also be an indication of a bubble formation. Detection of a bubble is a tedious task primarily due to the fundamental value of the security being uncertain, the randomness of the fundamentals of the market make detecting bubbles an arduous task. Ratios that foretold the financial crisis of 2007- Market Capitalization to GDP (Buffet Indicator), Price to Earnings Ratio (PE Ratio), Price to Book Value (PB Ratio), Tobin’s Q. Data is collected from the 1999-2000 from various Indian indices such as NIFTY 50, NIFTY NEXT 50, NIFTY BANK, NIFTY 500 S&P BSE SENSEX, S&P BSE 100. The paper utilizes the ratios mentioned above to detect and back track various bubble episodes in the Indian market; methodology used is the Philips et al (2015) right tailed unit test. The paper is also inclined to take steps to mitigate the effects of bubble by amending the financial policies and the monetary liquidity of the financial system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对印度市场泡沫的质疑
印度等新兴市场为投资者提供的回报远高于发达市场;从1995年到2014年的平均回报率来看,发达市场(不包括美国)的回报率为4.714%至3.276%。大多数新兴市场开始加入世界资本市场,从而允许大量资本流入,从而为经济增长铺平了道路。尽管新兴市场提供了高回报,但这也可能是泡沫形成的迹象。检测泡沫是一项繁琐的任务,主要是因为证券的基本价值是不确定的,市场基本面的随机性使检测泡沫成为一项艰巨的任务。预测2007年金融危机的比率-市值占GDP(巴菲特指标),市盈率(PE比率),市净率(PB比率),托宾Q.数据收集自1999-2000年的各种印度指数,如NIFTY 50, NIFTY NEXT 50, NIFTY BANK, NIFTY 500 s&p BSE SENSEX, s&p BSE 100。本文利用上述比率来检测和回溯印度市场的各种泡沫事件;使用的方法是Philips等人(2015)右尾单元测试。本文还倾向于采取措施,通过修改金融政策和金融体系的货币流动性来减轻泡沫的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Military Policing Exacerbates Crime and May Increase Human Rights Abuses: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Cali, Colombia Color, Loan Approval, and Crimes: The Dark Side of Mortgage Market Deregulation Time-of-Day and Day-of-Week Variations in Amazon Mechanical Turk Survey Responses Education Equity During COVID-19: Analyzing In-Person Priority Policies for Students with Disabilities Gender Mix and Team Performance: Differences between Exogenously and Endogenously Formed Teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1