Wesley and Beyond

S. Hey, J. Roux
{"title":"Wesley and Beyond","authors":"S. Hey, J. Roux","doi":"10.1179/ate.9.2.14814683154531jj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Christian students often struggle with the challenge of integrating the faith of their upbringing and traditions with the critical perspectives and the plurality of viewpoints required in tertiary education. This article argues that a useful framework for integrating this diversity of viewpoints and their faith traditions is provided by combining the notion of a quadrilateral of four sources of knowledge that Christians most value, namely tradition, bible, reason and experience, combined with a theological reflection model, such as Thomas Groome’s praxis cycle, which promotes reflection on the application of these sources to life and mission. This enlarged epistemological framework is shown to be useful for promoting intellectual development and faith maturation, through a process of experiential learning such as described in the writings of David Kolb (1983). It is argued that this framework for learning and reflection is more closely aligned with holistic approaches of the ancient Hebrews and Scripture than the narrower singular secular approaches to knowing and learning taken by many tertiary institutions.","PeriodicalId":224329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/ate.9.2.14814683154531jj","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Christian students often struggle with the challenge of integrating the faith of their upbringing and traditions with the critical perspectives and the plurality of viewpoints required in tertiary education. This article argues that a useful framework for integrating this diversity of viewpoints and their faith traditions is provided by combining the notion of a quadrilateral of four sources of knowledge that Christians most value, namely tradition, bible, reason and experience, combined with a theological reflection model, such as Thomas Groome’s praxis cycle, which promotes reflection on the application of these sources to life and mission. This enlarged epistemological framework is shown to be useful for promoting intellectual development and faith maturation, through a process of experiential learning such as described in the writings of David Kolb (1983). It is argued that this framework for learning and reflection is more closely aligned with holistic approaches of the ancient Hebrews and Scripture than the narrower singular secular approaches to knowing and learning taken by many tertiary institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韦斯利与超越
摘要:基督教学生经常面临着将他们成长过程中的信仰和传统与高等教育中所要求的批判性观点和多元化观点相结合的挑战。本文认为,将基督徒最看重的四种知识来源(即传统、圣经、理性和经验)的四边形概念与神学反思模型(如托马斯·格罗姆的实践周期)相结合,可以提供一个整合这种观点多样性及其信仰传统的有用框架,该模型促进了对这些来源在生活和使命中的应用的反思。这种扩大的认识论框架被证明对促进智力发展和信仰成熟是有用的,通过David Kolb(1983)著作中描述的经验学习过程。有人认为,这种学习和反思的框架更接近于古希伯来书和圣经的整体方法,而不是许多高等教育机构采用的狭隘的单一世俗方法来认识和学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Threshold of Conscience: A Radical Challenge for Education in Theological Ethics … and Beyond ‘Dissolving Boundaries’ – An Analysis of Threshold Concepts Within Disability Theology Cognition or Spiritual Disposition? Threshold Concepts in Theological Reflection† ‘Tell Me the Landscapes in Which You Live and I Will Tell You Who You Are’ – Online Theology Students Crossing Thresholds in Religious Education and Spirituality Against an Australian Desert Context A Response: Threshold Concepts in Religious Education and Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1