Feminist Evaluation and Research: Theory and Practice by S. Brisolara, D. Seigert, and S. SenGupta

Kate Winter
{"title":"Feminist Evaluation and Research: Theory and Practice by S. Brisolara, D. Seigert, and S. SenGupta","authors":"Kate Winter","doi":"10.1080/19407882.2016.1214603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I had the pleasure of reviewing Feminist Evaluation and Research: Theory and Practice (Brisolara, Seigart, & SenGupta, 2014) between attending the 8th European Conference on Gender Equality in Higher Education and the 11th Biennial Meeting of the European Evaluation Society. Both meetings included frequent references to many aspects of the volume. This was not only because the contributing authors are all recognized experts in the field but also because they clearly position their contributions within the rich literature of the fields of feminist theory, evaluation, and research. While the word “feminist” may result in knee-jerk reactions of either support or opposition, the reality today is that incidents still occur—ranging from lesser pay for equal work to the abduction and sexual exploitation of women and girls—that are best understood, confronted, and ameliorated through a critical feminist lens. This edited volume lays out the evidence supporting that assertion and provides a sufficient introduction to feminist theory to bring newcomers in the field up to speed. The purpose of the volume was to build on the authors’ earlier contribution to the field (Seigart & Brisolara, 2002) to further the discussion and learning in the field of evaluation by addressing questions regarding: the role of evaluation and research, the methods evaluators and researchers use, the role of the evaluator/researcher, the values prevalent in evaluation and research—especially with a feminist, gender-equity, or equity lens—and the effect evaluators and researchers have on the programs, policies, and people we study and evaluate. Feminist evaluation and research: Theory and practice does not disappoint. The volume is comprised of 12 chapters divided into three sections that introduce feminist theories, research, and evaluation (five chapters); offer cases of feminist evaluation in practice (four chapters); and detail cases of feminist research in practice (three chapters). Brisolara, Seigert, and SenGupta provide clear and concise introduction and synthesis before and after the sections to ensure a coherent sum of the parts. This structure lays the necessary groundwork to ensure readers have","PeriodicalId":310518,"journal":{"name":"NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2016.1214603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I had the pleasure of reviewing Feminist Evaluation and Research: Theory and Practice (Brisolara, Seigart, & SenGupta, 2014) between attending the 8th European Conference on Gender Equality in Higher Education and the 11th Biennial Meeting of the European Evaluation Society. Both meetings included frequent references to many aspects of the volume. This was not only because the contributing authors are all recognized experts in the field but also because they clearly position their contributions within the rich literature of the fields of feminist theory, evaluation, and research. While the word “feminist” may result in knee-jerk reactions of either support or opposition, the reality today is that incidents still occur—ranging from lesser pay for equal work to the abduction and sexual exploitation of women and girls—that are best understood, confronted, and ameliorated through a critical feminist lens. This edited volume lays out the evidence supporting that assertion and provides a sufficient introduction to feminist theory to bring newcomers in the field up to speed. The purpose of the volume was to build on the authors’ earlier contribution to the field (Seigart & Brisolara, 2002) to further the discussion and learning in the field of evaluation by addressing questions regarding: the role of evaluation and research, the methods evaluators and researchers use, the role of the evaluator/researcher, the values prevalent in evaluation and research—especially with a feminist, gender-equity, or equity lens—and the effect evaluators and researchers have on the programs, policies, and people we study and evaluate. Feminist evaluation and research: Theory and practice does not disappoint. The volume is comprised of 12 chapters divided into three sections that introduce feminist theories, research, and evaluation (five chapters); offer cases of feminist evaluation in practice (four chapters); and detail cases of feminist research in practice (three chapters). Brisolara, Seigert, and SenGupta provide clear and concise introduction and synthesis before and after the sections to ensure a coherent sum of the parts. This structure lays the necessary groundwork to ensure readers have
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《女性主义评价与研究:理论与实践》作者:S. Brisolara, D. Seigert, S. SenGupta
在参加第八届欧洲高等教育性别平等会议和第11届欧洲评估学会双年会期间,我有幸阅读了《女权主义评估与研究:理论与实践》(Brisolara, Seigart, & SenGupta, 2014)。两次会议都经常提到本卷的许多方面。这不仅是因为投稿作者都是该领域公认的专家,还因为他们明确地将自己的贡献定位在女性主义理论、评价和研究领域的丰富文献中。虽然“女权主义者”这个词可能会导致支持或反对的下意识反应,但今天的现实是,从同工同酬到绑架和性剥削妇女和女孩的事件仍然发生,这些事件最好通过批判的女权主义视角来理解、面对和改善。这本编辑的卷列出了支持这一主张的证据,并提供了一个足够的介绍女权主义理论,使新人在该领域的速度。该卷的目的是建立在作者对该领域的早期贡献(Seigart & briisolara, 2002),通过解决以下问题,进一步讨论和学习评估领域:评估和研究的作用、评估人员和研究人员使用的方法、评估人员/研究人员的作用、评估和研究中普遍存在的价值观——特别是在女权主义、性别平等或公平的视角下——以及评估人员和研究人员对我们研究和评估的项目、政策和人员的影响。女性主义评价与研究:理论与实践不辜负。全书共12章,分为介绍女性主义理论、研究、评价(5章)等3个部分;提供实践中的女性主义评价案例(四章);并详细介绍了实践中的女性主义研究案例(三章)。Brisolara、Seigert和SenGupta在各章节前后提供了清晰而简洁的介绍和综合,以确保各部分的连贯总和。这种结构奠定了必要的基础,以确保读者有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Critical Mentoring: A Practical Guide By Torie Weiston-Serdan In Memoriam: Kelly Ward Experiences of Pretenure Counseling Professor Mothers “Do You Want Me to Become a Social Piranha?”: Smarts and Sexism in College Women’s Representation in the US TV Show, Greek College Women’s Leadership Self-Efficacy: An Examination Through the Framework of Emotionally Intelligent Leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1