Advanced techniques for understanding, profiling, and debugging object oriented systems

C. Laffra, A. Malhotra, Vicki de Mey
{"title":"Advanced techniques for understanding, profiling, and debugging object oriented systems","authors":"C. Laffra, A. Malhotra, Vicki de Mey","doi":"10.1145/260303.260326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This workshop was held on Sunday, prior to the actual conference. Participants were invited, based on a short position paper in which they explained what they think is missing in currently available tools for understanding, profiling and debugging of 00 systems. Half the people that responded came from academia, the other half from the software industry. Which was a nicely balanced participation. The phrase \" workshop \" suggests that participants have to work. However, our experiences from a couple of workshops, was that many of them look more like mini-conferences. Typically, there are too many paper presentations, and people are often forced to be much too passive. As a contrast, the nature of our workshop was intended to have no paper presentations at all. Instead, the participants very briefly presented who they were, told the rest where they came from, and were given an opportunity to show at most two slides. After these short presentations, we started the process of gathering issues. Very quickly, a list of issues was developed, and smaller groups were formed to discuss the topics in more detail. Some topics were more popular than others. After these sessions, the groups merged again for a session of issue gathering At the end of the day, we tried to collect some interesting conclusions to be presented as a panel at the panel sessions, to be started on Monday, the next day. This collection process was a little bit difficult, and kind of reflects the learning experience from a workshop with such an intensive nature. We did not have paper presentations, but people had a lot of interesting discussions, and it is very difficult to report on the results of a collection of many different discussions among enthusiastic people held during the day. This paper will show how to get your hands on the list of position papers that were sent in by the participants. This will give you an idea of the state-of-the-art of this subject. Furthermore, the issues that were raised in the different sessions will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":297156,"journal":{"name":"Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/260303.260326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This workshop was held on Sunday, prior to the actual conference. Participants were invited, based on a short position paper in which they explained what they think is missing in currently available tools for understanding, profiling and debugging of 00 systems. Half the people that responded came from academia, the other half from the software industry. Which was a nicely balanced participation. The phrase " workshop " suggests that participants have to work. However, our experiences from a couple of workshops, was that many of them look more like mini-conferences. Typically, there are too many paper presentations, and people are often forced to be much too passive. As a contrast, the nature of our workshop was intended to have no paper presentations at all. Instead, the participants very briefly presented who they were, told the rest where they came from, and were given an opportunity to show at most two slides. After these short presentations, we started the process of gathering issues. Very quickly, a list of issues was developed, and smaller groups were formed to discuss the topics in more detail. Some topics were more popular than others. After these sessions, the groups merged again for a session of issue gathering At the end of the day, we tried to collect some interesting conclusions to be presented as a panel at the panel sessions, to be started on Monday, the next day. This collection process was a little bit difficult, and kind of reflects the learning experience from a workshop with such an intensive nature. We did not have paper presentations, but people had a lot of interesting discussions, and it is very difficult to report on the results of a collection of many different discussions among enthusiastic people held during the day. This paper will show how to get your hands on the list of position papers that were sent in by the participants. This will give you an idea of the state-of-the-art of this subject. Furthermore, the issues that were raised in the different sessions will be discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于理解、分析和调试面向对象系统的高级技术
这个研讨会是在周日举行的,在实际会议之前。根据一份简短的意见书,邀请参与者解释他们认为目前可用的用于理解、分析和调试00系统的工具中缺少的东西。一半的受访者来自学术界,另一半来自软件行业。这是一个非常平衡的参与。“workshop”这个短语意味着参与者必须工作。然而,我们从几个研讨会的经验来看,其中许多看起来更像是小型会议。通常,有太多的书面报告,人们往往被迫过于被动。相比之下,我们的研讨会的本质是根本没有论文展示。相反,参与者非常简短地介绍了他们是谁,告诉其他人他们来自哪里,并有机会展示最多两张幻灯片。在这些简短的陈述之后,我们开始了收集问题的过程。很快,一份问题清单就形成了,并成立了更小的小组来更详细地讨论这些主题。有些话题比其他话题更受欢迎。在这些会议之后,这些小组再次合并,召开了一个议题会议。在一天结束的时候,我们试图收集一些有趣的结论,以便在第二天星期一开始的小组会议上作为小组提出。这个收集的过程有点困难,但也反映了在一个密集的工作坊中学习的经历。我们没有论文展示,但是人们进行了很多有趣的讨论,而且很难报告白天热情的人们进行的许多不同讨论的结果。这篇论文将告诉你如何拿到与会者提交的意见书清单。这将使你对这门学科的最新进展有一个概念。此外,将讨论在各届会议上提出的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Specification of behavioral semantics in object-oriented information modeling The object paradigm and development process standards Object persistence in heterogeneous database environments Reengineering legacy systems using GUI and client/server technology Comparison of OOA and real-time SA—from the experiment of analyzing an image filing system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1