Jennifer Rasch, Jonathan Pfaff, H. Schwarz, D. Marpe, T. Wiegand
{"title":"Comparison between the Diffusion and the ADMM Filter and Combined Results","authors":"Jennifer Rasch, Jonathan Pfaff, H. Schwarz, D. Marpe, T. Wiegand","doi":"10.1109/PCS48520.2019.8954493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we compare two different methods to filter prediction signals in video coding: The anisotropic diffusion filter modeled using a (modified) heat equation and the ADMM (Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers) filter using directional total variation. The two methods are based on the same idea, namely using the structures in the underlying prediction signal to control the direction of the smoothing. It is shown here, that mathematically, in a continuous setting for a certain choice of parameters, the solutions of the two problem formulations are the same.Both filters are compared in the setting of a software based on HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding). While the results for the diffusion filter method involve the testing of four different filters of uniform and signal adaptive type, the ADMM filter results feature only one type of filter configuration that can be en- or disabled in a block-wise manner. Despite the fact that both methods rely on the same idea, it is illustrated that the overall gains of the combination are higher than the RD gains of the individual tools. In particular, it is demonstrated that this is still the case if the filters are combined in an exclusive way. This proves that there is an additional value for each of the filter methods.","PeriodicalId":237809,"journal":{"name":"2019 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCS48520.2019.8954493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this paper we compare two different methods to filter prediction signals in video coding: The anisotropic diffusion filter modeled using a (modified) heat equation and the ADMM (Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers) filter using directional total variation. The two methods are based on the same idea, namely using the structures in the underlying prediction signal to control the direction of the smoothing. It is shown here, that mathematically, in a continuous setting for a certain choice of parameters, the solutions of the two problem formulations are the same.Both filters are compared in the setting of a software based on HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding). While the results for the diffusion filter method involve the testing of four different filters of uniform and signal adaptive type, the ADMM filter results feature only one type of filter configuration that can be en- or disabled in a block-wise manner. Despite the fact that both methods rely on the same idea, it is illustrated that the overall gains of the combination are higher than the RD gains of the individual tools. In particular, it is demonstrated that this is still the case if the filters are combined in an exclusive way. This proves that there is an additional value for each of the filter methods.
在本文中,我们比较了两种不同的方法来滤波预测信号在视频编码:各向异性扩散滤波器建模使用(修正)热方程和ADMM(交替方向乘法器)滤波器使用方向总变分。这两种方法基于相同的思想,即利用底层预测信号中的结构来控制平滑的方向。从数学上讲,在某一参数选择的连续设置下,这两个问题的解是相同的。在基于HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding)的软件设置中对两种滤波器进行了比较。虽然扩散滤波器方法的结果涉及对均匀和信号自适应类型的四种不同滤波器的测试,但ADMM滤波器结果仅具有一种类型的滤波器配置,可以以块方式启用或禁用。尽管事实上这两种方法都依赖于相同的思想,但它说明了组合的总体收益高于单个工具的RD收益。特别是,如果过滤器以排他的方式组合,则仍然是这种情况。这证明每个过滤器方法都有一个附加值。