Two decades of brand hate research: a review and research agenda

Ramesh Kumar, Charles Jebarajakirthy, Haroon Iqbal Maseeh, Komal Dhanda, Raiswa Saha, Richa Dahiya
{"title":"Two decades of brand hate research: a review and research agenda","authors":"Ramesh Kumar, Charles Jebarajakirthy, Haroon Iqbal Maseeh, Komal Dhanda, Raiswa Saha, Richa Dahiya","doi":"10.1108/mip-01-2023-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis review aims to synthesize the brand hate literature and suggest directions for future research on brand hate.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted an integrative literature review method to synthesize and assess the brand hate literature.FindingsThe synthesis showed that social identity theory, disidentification theory and duplex theory are prominently used in brand hate studies, and a larger portion of brand hate research was conducted in Western countries. Further, brand-related, self-congruity, personal factors, information influence and brand community influence are the major types of antecedents of brand hate which can produce soft or hard consequences. Lexicometric analysis showed causes of brand hate, consumers' negative emotional and behavioral outcomes and community anti-brand behavior as key themes of brand hate research.Research limitations/implicationsThe synthesis has followed predefined criteria for the inclusion research papers. Thus, the review is limited to articles that fulfilled the criteria for inclusion.Practical implicationsThe finding will help marketers, specially brand managers, craft strategies to handle brand hate.Originality/valueThe brand hate literature is still developing and remains incoherent, suggesting that a synthesized review is needed. This study has systematically reviewed and synthesized the brand hate literature to study its development over time and proposes a framework which provides a comprehensive understanding of brand hate.","PeriodicalId":402197,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-01-2023-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis review aims to synthesize the brand hate literature and suggest directions for future research on brand hate.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted an integrative literature review method to synthesize and assess the brand hate literature.FindingsThe synthesis showed that social identity theory, disidentification theory and duplex theory are prominently used in brand hate studies, and a larger portion of brand hate research was conducted in Western countries. Further, brand-related, self-congruity, personal factors, information influence and brand community influence are the major types of antecedents of brand hate which can produce soft or hard consequences. Lexicometric analysis showed causes of brand hate, consumers' negative emotional and behavioral outcomes and community anti-brand behavior as key themes of brand hate research.Research limitations/implicationsThe synthesis has followed predefined criteria for the inclusion research papers. Thus, the review is limited to articles that fulfilled the criteria for inclusion.Practical implicationsThe finding will help marketers, specially brand managers, craft strategies to handle brand hate.Originality/valueThe brand hate literature is still developing and remains incoherent, suggesting that a synthesized review is needed. This study has systematically reviewed and synthesized the brand hate literature to study its development over time and proposes a framework which provides a comprehensive understanding of brand hate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二十年的品牌仇恨研究:回顾与研究议程
目的对品牌仇恨相关文献进行梳理,为今后品牌仇恨研究提出方向。设计/方法/方法本研究采用综合文献综述法对品牌仇恨文献进行综合和评估。综上所述,社会认同理论、去认同理论和双重理论在品牌仇恨研究中得到了突出的应用,而品牌仇恨研究的大部分是在西方国家进行的。品牌相关、自我一致性、个人因素、信息影响和品牌社区影响是品牌仇恨的主要前因式,可以产生软后果或硬后果。词汇计量学分析表明,品牌仇恨的成因、消费者的负面情绪和行为结果以及社区反品牌行为是品牌仇恨研究的关键主题。研究限制/意义:本综述遵循纳入研究论文的预定义标准。因此,审查仅限于符合纳入标准的文章。这一发现将有助于营销人员,特别是品牌经理制定应对品牌仇恨的策略。关于品牌仇恨的文献仍在发展中,仍然不连贯,这表明需要进行综合审查。本研究系统地回顾和综合了品牌仇恨文献,以研究其随着时间的发展,并提出了一个框架,提供了对品牌仇恨的全面理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social media communication, consumer attitude and purchase intention in lifestyle category products: a PLS-SEM modeling Social media communication, consumer attitude and purchase intention in lifestyle category products: a PLS-SEM modeling Brand equity and financial performance: an institutional view Unveiling promotion-induced variety-seeking: the roles of various types of promotional rewards and shopping motivations Logistics service failures and recovery strategies: is the response time or the discount amount more important?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1