CHAPTER SIX. French State Engineers and the Ambiguities of Technocracy

T. Porter
{"title":"CHAPTER SIX. French State Engineers and the Ambiguities of Technocracy","authors":"T. Porter","doi":"10.1515/9781400821617-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter evaluates technocracy in France. The Ecole Polytechnique, a product of the French Revolution, is often taken to epitomize technocratic culture in France. Polytechnique, with its emphasis on mathematics and science, was central to the invention of the modern engineer. Quite unlike its imitators, it educated the highest stratum of elites. Where else has administrative power been so closely allied to technical knowledge? This alliance helps to explain the French tradition of what would now be called applied economics. The chapter then focuses on economic calculation in action. Accounting means, among other things, placing monetary values on goods and services that contribute to production or sales but cannot themselves be readily exchanged in the marketplace. Nineteenth-century French engineers went one step further, attempting an analysis of the (often unpriced) benefits of public goods to balance against their monetary cost. In this context, values had to be placed on objects, services, and relationships for which there was no proper market, or whose prices could give no adequate measure of their value to users. This “cost–benefit analysis,” to introduce the anachronistic term, remains an elaborate form of accounting.","PeriodicalId":178798,"journal":{"name":"Trust in Numbers","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trust in Numbers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821617-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter evaluates technocracy in France. The Ecole Polytechnique, a product of the French Revolution, is often taken to epitomize technocratic culture in France. Polytechnique, with its emphasis on mathematics and science, was central to the invention of the modern engineer. Quite unlike its imitators, it educated the highest stratum of elites. Where else has administrative power been so closely allied to technical knowledge? This alliance helps to explain the French tradition of what would now be called applied economics. The chapter then focuses on economic calculation in action. Accounting means, among other things, placing monetary values on goods and services that contribute to production or sales but cannot themselves be readily exchanged in the marketplace. Nineteenth-century French engineers went one step further, attempting an analysis of the (often unpriced) benefits of public goods to balance against their monetary cost. In this context, values had to be placed on objects, services, and relationships for which there was no proper market, or whose prices could give no adequate measure of their value to users. This “cost–benefit analysis,” to introduce the anachronistic term, remains an elaborate form of accounting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第六章。法国国家工程师和技术官僚的模糊性
本章评价法国的技术官僚政治。巴黎综合理工学院(Ecole Polytechnique)是法国大革命的产物,经常被视为法国技术官僚文化的缩影。强调数学和科学的综合理工学院是现代工程师发明的核心。与模仿者不同的是,它培养了最高阶层的精英。还有什么地方的行政权力与技术知识如此紧密地联系在一起?这种联盟有助于解释现在被称为应用经济学的法国传统。然后,本章着重于实际的经济计算。除其他事项外,会计意味着对有助于生产或销售但本身不能在市场上轻易交换的商品和服务赋予货币价值。19世纪的法国工程师更进了一步,他们试图分析公共产品的收益(通常是无法定价的),以平衡它们的货币成本。在这种情况下,必须把价值放在没有适当市场的物品、服务和关系上,或者它们的价格不能充分衡量它们对用户的价值。这种“成本效益分析”(引入一个不合时宜的术语)仍然是一种复杂的会计形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgments CHAPTER EIGHT. Objectivity and the Politics of Disciplines Frontmatter CHAPTER TWO. How Social Numbers Are Made Valid CHAPTER ONE. A World of Artifice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1