Reciprocity, Self-Interest and Reputation: Debt vs Equity Contracts

Syed Munawar Shah, Mariani Abdul-Majid
{"title":"Reciprocity, Self-Interest and Reputation: Debt vs Equity Contracts","authors":"Syed Munawar Shah, Mariani Abdul-Majid","doi":"10.1108/IES-05-2019-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to examine whether reputation element affects the decision relative performance of trust, bonus and incentive contracts using social laboratory experiments.,The study conducts the following lab experiments bonus–incentive treatment without reputation, bonus–incentive treatment with reputation and trust–incentive treatment with reputation.,The study finds that the reputation and fairness concerns, in contrast to self-interest, may have a decisive impact on the actual and optimal choices in the reciprocity-based contracts. The principal pays higher salaries in the bonus contract as compared to an incentive contract.,The study contributes to the behavioral economic literature in the following dimensions. The existing literature on lab experiments considers a bonus contract as better than the debt contract; however, it does not consider the trust contract better than the debt contract.","PeriodicalId":410187,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Institutions & Financing Practices (Topic)","volume":"26 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Institutions & Financing Practices (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IES-05-2019-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether reputation element affects the decision relative performance of trust, bonus and incentive contracts using social laboratory experiments.,The study conducts the following lab experiments bonus–incentive treatment without reputation, bonus–incentive treatment with reputation and trust–incentive treatment with reputation.,The study finds that the reputation and fairness concerns, in contrast to self-interest, may have a decisive impact on the actual and optimal choices in the reciprocity-based contracts. The principal pays higher salaries in the bonus contract as compared to an incentive contract.,The study contributes to the behavioral economic literature in the following dimensions. The existing literature on lab experiments considers a bonus contract as better than the debt contract; however, it does not consider the trust contract better than the debt contract.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互惠、自利和声誉:债务与股权合同
本文的目的是通过社会实验室实验来检验声誉因素是否影响信任、奖金和激励合同的决策相对绩效。本研究进行了以下实验室实验:无声誉奖金激励待遇、有声誉奖金激励待遇和有声誉信任激励待遇。研究发现,与自利相比,声誉和公平问题可能对互惠契约中的实际选择和最优选择产生决定性影响。与激励合同相比,在奖金合同中,委托人支付的工资更高。本研究对行为经济学文献的贡献主要体现在以下几个方面。现有的实验室实验文献认为奖金合同优于债务合同;但并不认为信托合同优于债务合同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financing Intermediate Inputs and Misallocation: Evidence from China’s Firm-Level Data Nigeria as a Global Hub for Traditional and Islamic Green Financing ESG and the Pricing of IPOs: Does Sustainability Matter Competition in the Project Finance Loan Industry in Europe Sovereign Bond Restructuring: Commitment vs. Flexibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1