Territorial Recovery of Hungary through the 2nd Vienna Award: 1940. 8. 30.

J. Y. Kim
{"title":"Territorial Recovery of Hungary through the 2nd Vienna Award: 1940. 8. 30.","authors":"J. Y. Kim","doi":"10.19170/eebs.2022.46.4.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Second World War, Hungary was an ally of Germany, joining the Axis powers in August 1940 under the Second Vienna Award. Joachim von Ribbentrop, Germany’s Foreign Minister, and Italian Foreign Minister Galeazzo Ciano met with Hungarian and Romanian representatives in the Belvedere Palace in Vienna. There they began negotiations on Hungary recovering the territory of Transylvania that it had ceded to Romania as a consequence of World War One. The confrontation between Hungary and Romania meant that Hungary’s demands were not accepted. As a result of Ribbentrop and Ciano’s mediation, the two sides agreed to redraw the boundaries of the territory to account for population composition and historical claims to sovereignty. Hungary failed to realize their ambitious dream of recovering the entire territory of Transylvania, and they had to be content with taking back the region of Székelys, where Hungarians were in the majority. Romania’s sovereignty over the rest of Transylvania, which Romania had taken control over post-World War One, was recognized. However, this deal would ultimately hurt Hungary. Because it was brokered by Germany and Italy, Hungary was treated as a defeated state in the post-World War Two peace negotiations.","PeriodicalId":142621,"journal":{"name":"East European and Balkan Institute","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European and Balkan Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19170/eebs.2022.46.4.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Second World War, Hungary was an ally of Germany, joining the Axis powers in August 1940 under the Second Vienna Award. Joachim von Ribbentrop, Germany’s Foreign Minister, and Italian Foreign Minister Galeazzo Ciano met with Hungarian and Romanian representatives in the Belvedere Palace in Vienna. There they began negotiations on Hungary recovering the territory of Transylvania that it had ceded to Romania as a consequence of World War One. The confrontation between Hungary and Romania meant that Hungary’s demands were not accepted. As a result of Ribbentrop and Ciano’s mediation, the two sides agreed to redraw the boundaries of the territory to account for population composition and historical claims to sovereignty. Hungary failed to realize their ambitious dream of recovering the entire territory of Transylvania, and they had to be content with taking back the region of Székelys, where Hungarians were in the majority. Romania’s sovereignty over the rest of Transylvania, which Romania had taken control over post-World War One, was recognized. However, this deal would ultimately hurt Hungary. Because it was brokered by Germany and Italy, Hungary was treated as a defeated state in the post-World War Two peace negotiations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过第二次维也纳条约收复匈牙利领土:1940年。8. 30.
德国外交部长约阿希姆·冯·里宾特洛甫(Joachim von Ribbentrop)和意大利外交部长加利亚佐·齐亚诺(Galeazzo Ciano)在维也纳美景宫会见了匈牙利和罗马尼亚代表。在那里,他们开始就匈牙利收回第一次世界大战割让给罗马尼亚的特兰西瓦尼亚领土的问题进行谈判。匈牙利和罗马尼亚之间的对峙意味着匈牙利的要求没有被接受。由于里宾特洛甫和齐亚诺的调解,双方同意重新划定领土边界,以考虑到人口构成和历史上对主权的要求。匈牙利未能实现其收复整个特兰西瓦尼亚领土的雄心勃勃的梦想,他们不得不满足于夺回匈牙利人占多数的szsamukelys地区。罗马尼亚对特兰西瓦尼亚其余地区的主权得到承认,特兰西瓦尼亚是罗马尼亚在第一次世界大战后控制的。然而,这笔交易最终会伤害匈牙利。在德国和意大利的斡旋下,匈牙利在二战后的和平谈判中被视为战败国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of Key Trends in Russian Cinema for 2022~2023 The Dynamic Cohesion Of Idea And Aesthetics: Multi­layered Narrative Of Tolstoy’s Resurrection The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on Ukrainian Education and Future Challenges Comparative Analysis of Black and White’s Color Meaning Symbol: Analysis of Korean-Hungarian Folksong’s Text Ustaše Ethnolinguistic-Racical Ideology in ‘Croatian Purism’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1