Inference in Probabilistic Logic Programs using Lifted Explanations

Arun Nampally, C. Ramakrishnan
{"title":"Inference in Probabilistic Logic Programs using Lifted Explanations","authors":"Arun Nampally, C. Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we consider the problem of lifted inference in the context of Prism-like probabilistic logic programming languages. Traditional inference in such languages involves the construction of an explanation graph for the query and computing probabilities over this graph. When evaluating queries over probabilistic logic programs with a large number of instances of random variables, traditional methods treat each instance separately. For many programs and queries, we observe that explanations can be summarized into substantially more compact structures, which we call lifted explanation graphs. In this paper, we define lifted explanation graphs and operations over them. In contrast to existing lifted inference techniques, our method for constructing lifted explanations naturally generalizes existing methods for constructing explanation graphs. To compute probability of query answers, we solve recurrences generated from the lifted graphs. We show examples where the use of our technique reduces the asymptotic complexity of inference.","PeriodicalId":271041,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Logic Programming","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Logic Programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of lifted inference in the context of Prism-like probabilistic logic programming languages. Traditional inference in such languages involves the construction of an explanation graph for the query and computing probabilities over this graph. When evaluating queries over probabilistic logic programs with a large number of instances of random variables, traditional methods treat each instance separately. For many programs and queries, we observe that explanations can be summarized into substantially more compact structures, which we call lifted explanation graphs. In this paper, we define lifted explanation graphs and operations over them. In contrast to existing lifted inference techniques, our method for constructing lifted explanations naturally generalizes existing methods for constructing explanation graphs. To compute probability of query answers, we solve recurrences generated from the lifted graphs. We show examples where the use of our technique reduces the asymptotic complexity of inference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用提升解释的概率逻辑程序中的推理
本文研究了类棱镜概率逻辑程序设计语言中的提升推理问题。这类语言的传统推理包括为查询构造一个解释图并计算该图上的概率。在评估对具有大量随机变量实例的概率逻辑程序的查询时,传统方法分别处理每个实例。对于许多程序和查询,我们观察到解释可以被总结成实质上更紧凑的结构,我们称之为提升的解释图。在本文中,我们定义了提升解释图及其上的操作。与现有的提升推理技术相比,我们构建提升解释的方法自然地推广了现有的构建解释图的方法。为了计算查询答案的概率,我们求解由提升图生成的递归。我们展示了使用我们的技术降低推理的渐近复杂性的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Explaining Actual Causation via Reasoning About Actions and Change Speeding up Lazy-Grounding Answer Set Solving Improving Candidate Quality of Probabilistic Logic Models Epistemic Logic Programs with World View Constraints Learning Commonsense Knowledge Through Interactive Dialogue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1